System-level reliability using component-level failure signatures

R. Wong, B. Bhuva, A. Evans, S. Wen
{"title":"System-level reliability using component-level failure signatures","authors":"R. Wong, B. Bhuva, A. Evans, S. Wen","doi":"10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System-level Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is usually evaluated using individual component-level reliability metrics. System-level failures are categorized by Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) metrics. However, RAS evaluation at the system-level requires precise mapping between component failure modes, their system failure signatures and system reliability requirements. In this paper, RAS analysis carried out on internet switches in a top-down hierarchical fashion is presented. Results show availability of failure classification at a lower-level of design allows for better fault management and improved RAS metrics at the system-level. A hierarchical modeling format is proposed to standardize the reporting of component failure modes to improve the system level modeling of RAS.","PeriodicalId":341663,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

System-level Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is usually evaluated using individual component-level reliability metrics. System-level failures are categorized by Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) metrics. However, RAS evaluation at the system-level requires precise mapping between component failure modes, their system failure signatures and system reliability requirements. In this paper, RAS analysis carried out on internet switches in a top-down hierarchical fashion is presented. Results show availability of failure classification at a lower-level of design allows for better fault management and improved RAS metrics at the system-level. A hierarchical modeling format is proposed to standardize the reporting of component failure modes to improve the system level modeling of RAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用组件级故障签名的系统级可靠性
系统级平均无故障时间(MTBF)通常使用单个组件级可靠性度量来评估。系统级故障按可靠性、可用性和可服务性(RAS)指标分类。然而,系统级的RAS评估需要组件故障模式、它们的系统故障签名和系统可靠性需求之间的精确映射。本文以自顶向下的分层方式对互联网交换机进行了RAS分析。结果表明,在较低层次的设计中,故障分类的可用性允许更好的故障管理和改进系统级的RAS指标。提出了一种分层建模格式来规范构件失效模式的报告,以改进RAS的系统级建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scaling effect and circuit type dependence of neutron induced single event transient Study of TDDB reliability in misaligned via chain structures Impact of backside interface on Hot Carriers degradation of thin film FDSOI Nmosfets A consistent physical framework for N and P BTI in HKMG MOSFETs Controlling uniformity of RRAM characteristics through the forming process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1