Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty

P. Diana, P. Casale, A. Saita, G. Lughezzani, N. Buffi
{"title":"Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty","authors":"P. Diana, P. Casale, A. Saita, G. Lughezzani, N. Buffi","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.90642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is represented by the Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty, even if different approaches, both surgical and endoscopic, have been described. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RP) is a feasible and safe approach. The indications for the robotic approach remain the same as those for the laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty. Every patient with symptomatic UPJO, or with decreasing renal function in the presence of UPJO, should undergo RP. The transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, and transmesocolic approaches are described focusing on advantages and disadvan-tages of each approach. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty has excellent success rates for relief of obstruction and very low peri- and post-operative morbidity. The robotic surgical technique maintains the advantages of laparoscopic surgery providing a more precise manipulation and visualization, and a faster learning curve. Comparative studies are reported to confront the different techniques. Secondary minimally invasive pyeloplasty is obviously a more challenging procedure due to the fibrosis and the adhesions formed after the previous surgery. Newer techniques and indications such as the employment of buccal mucosal graft, the single port approach, and indocyanine green injection are described. Tips and tricks to keep in mind during this kind of procedure are listed in order to report our experience in this setting.","PeriodicalId":329470,"journal":{"name":"Medical Robotics - New Achievements","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Robotics - New Achievements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The standard treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is represented by the Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty, even if different approaches, both surgical and endoscopic, have been described. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RP) is a feasible and safe approach. The indications for the robotic approach remain the same as those for the laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty. Every patient with symptomatic UPJO, or with decreasing renal function in the presence of UPJO, should undergo RP. The transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, and transmesocolic approaches are described focusing on advantages and disadvan-tages of each approach. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty has excellent success rates for relief of obstruction and very low peri- and post-operative morbidity. The robotic surgical technique maintains the advantages of laparoscopic surgery providing a more precise manipulation and visualization, and a faster learning curve. Comparative studies are reported to confront the different techniques. Secondary minimally invasive pyeloplasty is obviously a more challenging procedure due to the fibrosis and the adhesions formed after the previous surgery. Newer techniques and indications such as the employment of buccal mucosal graft, the single port approach, and indocyanine green injection are described. Tips and tricks to keep in mind during this kind of procedure are listed in order to report our experience in this setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管盂连接处阻塞:机器人辅助肾盂成形术
输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻(UPJO)的标准治疗以Anderson-Hynes肢解肾盂成形术为代表,即使已经描述了不同的手术和内窥镜方法。机器人辅助肾盂成形术(RP)是一种可行且安全的方法。机器人入路的适应症与腹腔镜或开放式肾盂成形术相同。所有有UPJO症状的患者,或UPJO存在时肾功能下降的患者,都应该接受RP。本文对经腹膜、腹膜后和经肠系膜入路进行了描述,重点讨论了每种入路的优缺点。机器人辅助肾盂成形术在缓解梗阻方面成功率高,手术前后发病率低。机器人手术技术保持了腹腔镜手术的优点,提供了更精确的操作和可视化,以及更快的学习曲线。据报道,比较研究面对不同的技术。由于先前手术后形成的纤维化和粘连,二次微创肾盂成形术显然是一个更具挑战性的手术。更新的技术和适应症,如采用颊粘膜移植物,单口入路,吲哚菁绿注射。为了报告我们在这种情况下的经验,我们列出了在这种过程中要记住的提示和技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty An Active Exoskeleton Called P.I.G.R.O. Designed for Unloaded Robotic Neurorehabilitation Training Surgical Planning and Additive Manufacturing of an Anatomical Model: A Case Study of a Spine Surgery Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Prolapse of the Apical Segment of the Vagina Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAIL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1