What Makes Ontology Reasoning so Arduous?: Unveiling the key ontological features

N. Alaya, S. Yahia, M. Lamolle
{"title":"What Makes Ontology Reasoning so Arduous?: Unveiling the key ontological features","authors":"N. Alaya, S. Yahia, M. Lamolle","doi":"10.1145/2797115.2797117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reasoning with ontologies is one of the core fields of research in Description Logics. A variety of efficient reasoner with highly optimized algorithms have been developed to allow inference tasks on expressive ontology languages such as OWL(DL). However, reasoner reported computing times have exceeded and sometimes fall behind the expected theoretical values. From an empirical perspective, it is not yet well understood, which particular aspects in the ontology are reasoner performance degrading factors. In this paper, we conducted an investigation about state of art works that attempted to portray potential correlation between reasoner empirical behaviour and particular ontological features. These works were analysed and then broken down into categories. Further, we proposed a set of ontology features covering a broad range of structural and syntactic ontology characteristics. We claim that these features are good indicators of the ontology hardness level against reasoning tasks. In order to assess the worthiness of our proposals, we adopted a supervised machine learning approach. Features served as the bases to learn predictive models of reasoners robustness. These models was trained for 6 well known reasoners and using their evaluation results during the ORE'2014 competition. Our prediction models showed a high accuracy level which witness the effectiveness of our set of features.","PeriodicalId":386229,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2797115.2797117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Reasoning with ontologies is one of the core fields of research in Description Logics. A variety of efficient reasoner with highly optimized algorithms have been developed to allow inference tasks on expressive ontology languages such as OWL(DL). However, reasoner reported computing times have exceeded and sometimes fall behind the expected theoretical values. From an empirical perspective, it is not yet well understood, which particular aspects in the ontology are reasoner performance degrading factors. In this paper, we conducted an investigation about state of art works that attempted to portray potential correlation between reasoner empirical behaviour and particular ontological features. These works were analysed and then broken down into categories. Further, we proposed a set of ontology features covering a broad range of structural and syntactic ontology characteristics. We claim that these features are good indicators of the ontology hardness level against reasoning tasks. In order to assess the worthiness of our proposals, we adopted a supervised machine learning approach. Features served as the bases to learn predictive models of reasoners robustness. These models was trained for 6 well known reasoners and using their evaluation results during the ORE'2014 competition. Our prediction models showed a high accuracy level which witness the effectiveness of our set of features.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么让本体论推理如此艰难?:揭示关键的本体特征
本体推理是描述逻辑研究的核心领域之一。各种具有高度优化算法的高效推理器已经被开发出来,以允许在表达本体语言(如OWL(DL))上进行推理任务。然而,推理器报告的计算时间已经超过甚至有时落后于预期的理论值。从经验的角度来看,本体中哪些特定的方面是导致推理器性能下降的因素,目前还没有得到很好的理解。在本文中,我们对试图描绘推理者经验行为与特定本体论特征之间潜在相关性的艺术作品进行了调查。对这些作品进行了分析,然后分类。此外,我们提出了一套本体特征,涵盖了广泛的结构和句法本体特征。我们声称,这些特征是对推理任务的本体硬度的良好指标。为了评估我们提案的价值,我们采用了监督机器学习方法。特征作为学习推理器鲁棒性预测模型的基础。这些模型是为6个知名推理者训练的,并在2014年的ORE比赛中使用了他们的评估结果。我们的预测模型显示出较高的精度水平,这证明了我们的特征集的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling and predicting information search behavior An Ontology Enrichment Approach by Using DBpedia Semantic Integration of Structured Data Powered by Linked Open Data A LOD-based, query construction and refinement service for web search engines Recommending Customizable Products: A Multiple Choice Knapsack Solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1