Evaluation of microleakage of three different endodontic sealers in the presence and absence of moisture

H. Razavian, Kimia Hanjani, K. Hanjani, H. Mirmohammadi, Alireza Shabanian Boroujeni
{"title":"Evaluation of microleakage of three different endodontic sealers in the presence and absence of moisture","authors":"H. Razavian, Kimia Hanjani, K. Hanjani, H. Mirmohammadi, Alireza Shabanian Boroujeni","doi":"10.34172/jsums.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: AH26, Master-Dent, and Endoseal mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are three different types of sealers. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare THE apical seal of the root canal-treated teeth with the above-mentioned sealers in the presence and absence of moisture using the fluid filtration method. Methods: To this end, 54 freshly extracted single root canal human canines were selected for this study. The canals were prepared using rotary instruments, and then sodium hypochlorite was applied as an irrigation solution in this protocol. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 18. One group was obturated with the gutta-percha by the cold lateral compaction technique. Half of one of the aforementioned sealers belonged to the group of moistened teeth and the other half to the group of the dried teeth. Microleakage in all groups was assessed 3 months after the obturation of canals by the fluid filtration method. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests, and the level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results: The results showed that the minimum and maximum micro-leakage belonged to Masterdent dry (mean leakage = 1.7778 μL/ min/CmH20) and Endoseal-MTA dry (mean leakage = 3.5000 μL/min/CmH20), respectively. All three groups of sealers exhibited a significant difference in apical micro-leakage between dry and moist conditions (PMasterdent <0.001, PAH26=0.002, and PEndoseaL-MTA =0.007). Conclusion: The findings of this experimental study demonstrated that Masterdent provided the least apical micro-leakage under dry conditions while Endoseal-MTA had the highest micro-leakage under these conditions. There was a significant difference between dry and moist conditions in all groups.","PeriodicalId":318974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jsums.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: AH26, Master-Dent, and Endoseal mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are three different types of sealers. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare THE apical seal of the root canal-treated teeth with the above-mentioned sealers in the presence and absence of moisture using the fluid filtration method. Methods: To this end, 54 freshly extracted single root canal human canines were selected for this study. The canals were prepared using rotary instruments, and then sodium hypochlorite was applied as an irrigation solution in this protocol. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 18. One group was obturated with the gutta-percha by the cold lateral compaction technique. Half of one of the aforementioned sealers belonged to the group of moistened teeth and the other half to the group of the dried teeth. Microleakage in all groups was assessed 3 months after the obturation of canals by the fluid filtration method. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests, and the level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results: The results showed that the minimum and maximum micro-leakage belonged to Masterdent dry (mean leakage = 1.7778 μL/ min/CmH20) and Endoseal-MTA dry (mean leakage = 3.5000 μL/min/CmH20), respectively. All three groups of sealers exhibited a significant difference in apical micro-leakage between dry and moist conditions (PMasterdent <0.001, PAH26=0.002, and PEndoseaL-MTA =0.007). Conclusion: The findings of this experimental study demonstrated that Masterdent provided the least apical micro-leakage under dry conditions while Endoseal-MTA had the highest micro-leakage under these conditions. There was a significant difference between dry and moist conditions in all groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估三种不同的根管密封剂在有和没有水分的情况下的微泄漏
背景和目的:AH26, Master-Dent和Endoseal矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)是三种不同类型的密封剂。本研究的目的是评估和比较在有水分和没有水分的情况下,使用液体过滤方法对根管治疗牙齿的根尖密封与上述密封剂的密封效果。方法:选择新鲜拔牙的人犬单根管54根进行研究。使用旋转器械制备管道,然后在本方案中应用次氯酸钠作为灌溉溶液。这些标本被随机分为三组,每组18个。一组采用杜仲胶冷侧压实技术进行封闭。上面提到的一组牙齿中有一半是湿润的,另一半是干燥的。采用液体滤过法观察各组在封堵后3个月的微渗漏情况。数据分析采用方差分析和Tukey事后检验,P<0.05为显著性水平。结果:微泄漏最小为Masterdent干型(平均泄漏量为1.7778 μL/min/CmH20),最大为Endoseal-MTA干型(平均泄漏量为3.5000 μL/min/CmH20)。所有三组封口剂在干燥和潮湿条件下的根尖微渗漏有显著差异(PMasterdent <0.001, PAH26=0.002, PEndoseaL-MTA =0.007)。结论:在干燥条件下,Masterdent的根尖微渗漏最小,Endoseal-MTA的根尖微渗漏最大。在所有组中,干燥和潮湿条件之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of aerobic training and eugenol supplementation on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in skeletal muscle of male rats poisoned with chlorpyrifos The effect of eight weeks of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on some factors causing oxidative stress in the cardiomyocytes of mice with type II diabetes The effects of bromelain on osteoarthritis symptoms: A systematic review Neuroinflammation alleviation The effect of metformin along with high-intensity interval training on gene expression of FoxO1 and Atrogin-1 in type 2 diabetic mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1