Forum Contribution: Get rights right in the interests of security of tenure

A. Pope
{"title":"Forum Contribution: Get rights right in the interests of security of tenure","authors":"A. Pope","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V14I1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review of Land, Power & Custom: Controversies Generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act , edited by Aninka Claassens & Ben Cousins; xv and pp 392 with accompanying DVD. Legal Resources Centre & UCT Press, Cape Town, 2008 \n \nAnn Pope gives a detailed overview of a book on a topic that has assumed critical importance in South Africa and, at the same time, analyses and comments on difficulties and dilemmas that have been encountered in securing indigenous land rights. \n \nThe book was collated following the enactment of the Communal Land Rights Act 11 of 2004 and the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, in preparation for a challenge to the constitutionality of the former Act by alleging that it “undermines the rights of rural people to make them less secure than before”. Judgment in Tongoane and Others v National Minister for Agriculture and Land Affairs and Others (11678/2006) [2009] ZAGPPHC 127 (30 October 2009) has since been delivered, its findings being mostly in favour of the applicants. An analysis of the judgment is followed by further reflection on a number of issues. The discussion shows that, while the applicants in Tongoane can rightly claim victory for succeeding in having several provisions of the CLRA declared unconstitutional, important questions remain unanswered. The author suggests that the implications of such omissions will need careful and thoughtful treatment by the Constitutional Court during the confirmation hearing at the beginning of March 2010. At the time of publication the judgment in this hearing was not yet available.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V14I1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Review of Land, Power & Custom: Controversies Generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act , edited by Aninka Claassens & Ben Cousins; xv and pp 392 with accompanying DVD. Legal Resources Centre & UCT Press, Cape Town, 2008 Ann Pope gives a detailed overview of a book on a topic that has assumed critical importance in South Africa and, at the same time, analyses and comments on difficulties and dilemmas that have been encountered in securing indigenous land rights. The book was collated following the enactment of the Communal Land Rights Act 11 of 2004 and the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, in preparation for a challenge to the constitutionality of the former Act by alleging that it “undermines the rights of rural people to make them less secure than before”. Judgment in Tongoane and Others v National Minister for Agriculture and Land Affairs and Others (11678/2006) [2009] ZAGPPHC 127 (30 October 2009) has since been delivered, its findings being mostly in favour of the applicants. An analysis of the judgment is followed by further reflection on a number of issues. The discussion shows that, while the applicants in Tongoane can rightly claim victory for succeeding in having several provisions of the CLRA declared unconstitutional, important questions remain unanswered. The author suggests that the implications of such omissions will need careful and thoughtful treatment by the Constitutional Court during the confirmation hearing at the beginning of March 2010. At the time of publication the judgment in this hearing was not yet available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论坛贡献:在使用权安全的利益下获得权利
《土地、权力与习俗评论:南非公共土地权利法案引发的争议》,阿宁卡·克拉森和本·考辛斯主编;xv和pp 392随附DVD。法律资源中心和UCT出版社,开普敦,2008年安·波普详细概述了一本关于在南非至关重要的主题的书,同时,分析和评论了在确保土著土地权利方面遇到的困难和困境。这本书是在2004年第11号公共土地权利法案和2003年第41号传统领导和治理框架法案颁布后整理的,准备挑战前法案的合宪性,声称它“破坏了农村人民的权利,使他们比以前更不安全”。Tongoane及其他人诉国家农业和土地事务部长及其他人案(11678/2006)[2009]ZAGPPHC 127(2009年10月30日)的判决已经发布,其调查结果大多有利于申请人。在对判决书进行分析之后,对若干问题进行进一步的思考。讨论表明,虽然汤戈纳的申请人可以正当地宣称他们成功地使《加勒比地区法律援助法》的几项规定被宣布违宪而取得胜利,但一些重要问题仍未得到解答。作者建议说,宪法法院在2010年3月初举行的人事听证会上,需要仔细和深思熟虑地处理这种遗漏的影响。在本文发表之时,这次听证会的判决尚未公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1