Narrativity and Textuality in the Study of Stories

Moshe Simon-Shoshan
{"title":"Narrativity and Textuality in the Study of Stories","authors":"Moshe Simon-Shoshan","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to investigate some of the defining elements of \nnarrative. The underlying assumption of my discussion is that the \nterms \"narrative\" and \"story\" do not refer to clearly defined, \nself-enclosed genres. Rather, they are part of a spectrum which \nembraces all forms of texts. Similarly, narratives and stories are not \nindependent discourses but rather are an integral part of virtually \nall forms of discourse, be it day-to-day conversation or more \nspecialized discourses. In order to analyze the relationship between \nnarratives and other modes of discourse, we introduce the concept of \nnarrativity. Narrativity refers to a collection of textual attributes. \nAll texts exist along a continuum of greater or lesser narrativity, \ndepending on the number and prominence of the narrative attributes \nthey contain. When we refer to a text as a story, we mean that it \ncontains a critical mass of narrativity. Most theorists of narrative \nhave defined narrativity purely in terms of \"dynamism\" - that is, the \nextent to which a text portrays transition and change. To this I have \nadded the quality of \"specificity\". Specificity refers to the extent \nto which a text focuses on a particular time or place, a unique event, \nor individual people and objects. Many if not most texts contain a \ncertain degree of narrativity. We established, however, that in order \nto be considered a story the text must present a sequence of at least \ntwo interrelated events that occurred once and only once in the past. \nIn other words, a story must have a certain degree of dynamism in that \nit portrays the transition from at least one event to another. It must \nalso have specificity at least to the degree that the text narrates \nevents that happened at a fixed time in the past. This theoretical \nframework allows us to chart the relationship between different types \nof texts within a single discourse. It also gives us a vocabulary for \ndiscussing different parts of more complex narratives which often \ncontain elements of varying narrativity. The paper then goes on to \ndiscuss the concept of narrative structure, arguing that narrative \nstructure is not an inherent attribute of narrative texts but a \nframework that the reader imposes on the text in order to make it \nintelligible in terms of other narratives. The structure which the \nreader abstracts from a given narrative will be heavily dependent on \nthe context of the narrative with in a wider discourse.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper seeks to investigate some of the defining elements of narrative. The underlying assumption of my discussion is that the terms "narrative" and "story" do not refer to clearly defined, self-enclosed genres. Rather, they are part of a spectrum which embraces all forms of texts. Similarly, narratives and stories are not independent discourses but rather are an integral part of virtually all forms of discourse, be it day-to-day conversation or more specialized discourses. In order to analyze the relationship between narratives and other modes of discourse, we introduce the concept of narrativity. Narrativity refers to a collection of textual attributes. All texts exist along a continuum of greater or lesser narrativity, depending on the number and prominence of the narrative attributes they contain. When we refer to a text as a story, we mean that it contains a critical mass of narrativity. Most theorists of narrative have defined narrativity purely in terms of "dynamism" - that is, the extent to which a text portrays transition and change. To this I have added the quality of "specificity". Specificity refers to the extent to which a text focuses on a particular time or place, a unique event, or individual people and objects. Many if not most texts contain a certain degree of narrativity. We established, however, that in order to be considered a story the text must present a sequence of at least two interrelated events that occurred once and only once in the past. In other words, a story must have a certain degree of dynamism in that it portrays the transition from at least one event to another. It must also have specificity at least to the degree that the text narrates events that happened at a fixed time in the past. This theoretical framework allows us to chart the relationship between different types of texts within a single discourse. It also gives us a vocabulary for discussing different parts of more complex narratives which often contain elements of varying narrativity. The paper then goes on to discuss the concept of narrative structure, arguing that narrative structure is not an inherent attribute of narrative texts but a framework that the reader imposes on the text in order to make it intelligible in terms of other narratives. The structure which the reader abstracts from a given narrative will be heavily dependent on the context of the narrative with in a wider discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
故事研究中的叙事性与文本性
本文试图探讨叙事的一些定义要素。我的讨论的潜在假设是,“叙述”和“故事”这两个术语并不是指明确定义的、自我封闭的类型。相反,它们是包含所有文本形式的光谱的一部分。同样,叙事和故事也不是独立的话语,而是几乎所有话语形式的组成部分,无论是日常对话还是更专业的话语。为了分析叙事与其他话语方式的关系,我们引入了叙事性的概念。叙事性是指文本属性的集合。所有文本都存在于或多或少的叙事性连续体中,这取决于它们所包含的叙事属性的数量和突出程度。当我们将文本称为故事时,我们的意思是它包含了大量的叙事性。大多数叙事理论家纯粹从“动态性”的角度来定义叙事,也就是说,文本描绘过渡和变化的程度。在此基础上,我添加了“特异性”的特性。专一性是指文本对特定时间或地点、独特事件或个体人和物体的关注程度。许多(如果不是大多数的话)文本都包含一定程度的叙事性。然而,我们确定,为了被认为是一个故事,文本必须呈现至少两个相互关联的事件序列,这些事件在过去发生过一次且仅发生过一次。换句话说,故事必须具有一定程度的动态性,因为它描绘了至少从一个事件到另一个事件的过渡。它还必须具有特殊性,至少要达到文本叙述过去固定时间发生的事件的程度。这一理论框架使我们能够在单一话语中绘制出不同类型文本之间的关系。它也为我们提供了一个词汇来讨论更复杂的叙事的不同部分,这些叙事通常包含不同的叙事元素。接着,本文讨论了叙事结构的概念,认为叙事结构不是叙事文本的固有属性,而是读者强加给文本的一种框架,以使其与其他叙事相关联。读者从给定的叙述中抽象出的结构将在很大程度上取决于在更广泛的话语中叙述的上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of Computational Model for Yorùbá Folktale Narrative Comparing Extant Story Classifiers: Results & New Directions The Love Equation: Computational Modeling of Romantic Relationships in French Classical Drama Governing Narrative Events With Institutional Norms Animacy Detection in Stories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1