{"title":"Narrativity and Textuality in the Study of Stories","authors":"Moshe Simon-Shoshan","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to investigate some of the defining elements of \nnarrative. The underlying assumption of my discussion is that the \nterms \"narrative\" and \"story\" do not refer to clearly defined, \nself-enclosed genres. Rather, they are part of a spectrum which \nembraces all forms of texts. Similarly, narratives and stories are not \nindependent discourses but rather are an integral part of virtually \nall forms of discourse, be it day-to-day conversation or more \nspecialized discourses. In order to analyze the relationship between \nnarratives and other modes of discourse, we introduce the concept of \nnarrativity. Narrativity refers to a collection of textual attributes. \nAll texts exist along a continuum of greater or lesser narrativity, \ndepending on the number and prominence of the narrative attributes \nthey contain. When we refer to a text as a story, we mean that it \ncontains a critical mass of narrativity. Most theorists of narrative \nhave defined narrativity purely in terms of \"dynamism\" - that is, the \nextent to which a text portrays transition and change. To this I have \nadded the quality of \"specificity\". Specificity refers to the extent \nto which a text focuses on a particular time or place, a unique event, \nor individual people and objects. Many if not most texts contain a \ncertain degree of narrativity. We established, however, that in order \nto be considered a story the text must present a sequence of at least \ntwo interrelated events that occurred once and only once in the past. \nIn other words, a story must have a certain degree of dynamism in that \nit portrays the transition from at least one event to another. It must \nalso have specificity at least to the degree that the text narrates \nevents that happened at a fixed time in the past. This theoretical \nframework allows us to chart the relationship between different types \nof texts within a single discourse. It also gives us a vocabulary for \ndiscussing different parts of more complex narratives which often \ncontain elements of varying narrativity. The paper then goes on to \ndiscuss the concept of narrative structure, arguing that narrative \nstructure is not an inherent attribute of narrative texts but a \nframework that the reader imposes on the text in order to make it \nintelligible in terms of other narratives. The structure which the \nreader abstracts from a given narrative will be heavily dependent on \nthe context of the narrative with in a wider discourse.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This paper seeks to investigate some of the defining elements of
narrative. The underlying assumption of my discussion is that the
terms "narrative" and "story" do not refer to clearly defined,
self-enclosed genres. Rather, they are part of a spectrum which
embraces all forms of texts. Similarly, narratives and stories are not
independent discourses but rather are an integral part of virtually
all forms of discourse, be it day-to-day conversation or more
specialized discourses. In order to analyze the relationship between
narratives and other modes of discourse, we introduce the concept of
narrativity. Narrativity refers to a collection of textual attributes.
All texts exist along a continuum of greater or lesser narrativity,
depending on the number and prominence of the narrative attributes
they contain. When we refer to a text as a story, we mean that it
contains a critical mass of narrativity. Most theorists of narrative
have defined narrativity purely in terms of "dynamism" - that is, the
extent to which a text portrays transition and change. To this I have
added the quality of "specificity". Specificity refers to the extent
to which a text focuses on a particular time or place, a unique event,
or individual people and objects. Many if not most texts contain a
certain degree of narrativity. We established, however, that in order
to be considered a story the text must present a sequence of at least
two interrelated events that occurred once and only once in the past.
In other words, a story must have a certain degree of dynamism in that
it portrays the transition from at least one event to another. It must
also have specificity at least to the degree that the text narrates
events that happened at a fixed time in the past. This theoretical
framework allows us to chart the relationship between different types
of texts within a single discourse. It also gives us a vocabulary for
discussing different parts of more complex narratives which often
contain elements of varying narrativity. The paper then goes on to
discuss the concept of narrative structure, arguing that narrative
structure is not an inherent attribute of narrative texts but a
framework that the reader imposes on the text in order to make it
intelligible in terms of other narratives. The structure which the
reader abstracts from a given narrative will be heavily dependent on
the context of the narrative with in a wider discourse.