On statistical deficiency: Why the test statistic of the matching method is hopelessly underpowered and uniquely informative

M. C. Nelson
{"title":"On statistical deficiency: Why the test statistic of the matching method is hopelessly underpowered and uniquely informative","authors":"M. C. Nelson","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/y6rmb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The random variate m is, in combinatorics, a basis for comparing permutations, as well as the solution to a centuries-old riddle involving the mishandling of hats. In statistics, m is the test statistic for a disused null hypothesis statistical test (NHST) of association, the matching method. In this paper, I show that the matching method has an absolute and relatively low limit on its statistical power. I do so first by reinterpreting Rae's theorem, which describes the joint distributions of m with several rank correlation statistics under a true null. I then derive this property solely from m's unconditional sampling distribution, on which basis I develop the concept of a deficient statistic: a statistic that is insufficient and inconsistent and inefficient with respect to its parameter. Finally, I demonstrate an application for m that makes use of its deficiency to qualify the sampling error in a jointly estimated sample correlation.","PeriodicalId":413623,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Other Statistics","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y6rmb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The random variate m is, in combinatorics, a basis for comparing permutations, as well as the solution to a centuries-old riddle involving the mishandling of hats. In statistics, m is the test statistic for a disused null hypothesis statistical test (NHST) of association, the matching method. In this paper, I show that the matching method has an absolute and relatively low limit on its statistical power. I do so first by reinterpreting Rae's theorem, which describes the joint distributions of m with several rank correlation statistics under a true null. I then derive this property solely from m's unconditional sampling distribution, on which basis I develop the concept of a deficient statistic: a statistic that is insufficient and inconsistent and inefficient with respect to its parameter. Finally, I demonstrate an application for m that makes use of its deficiency to qualify the sampling error in a jointly estimated sample correlation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于统计缺陷:为什么匹配方法的检验统计量是无可奈何的不足和唯一的信息
在组合学中,随机变量m是比较排列的基础,也是解决一个涉及对帽子处理不当的百年谜题的方法。在统计学中,m是匹配方法关联的废弃零假设统计检验(NHST)的检验统计量。在本文中,我证明了匹配方法对其统计能力有一个绝对的和相对较低的限制。我首先通过重新解释Rae定理来做到这一点,该定理描述了在真零下具有多个秩相关统计量的m的联合分布。然后,我仅从m的无条件抽样分布中推导出这一性质,在此基础上,我提出了缺陷统计量的概念:相对于其参数而言,统计量是不充分的、不一致的和低效的。最后,我演示了m的一个应用,它利用m的不足来限定联合估计样本相关性中的抽样误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On statistical deficiency: Why the test statistic of the matching method is hopelessly underpowered and uniquely informative The rule of conditional probability is valid in quantum theory [Comment on Gelman & Yao's "Holes in Bayesian statistics"] Popper’s Falsification and Corroboration from the Statistical Perspectives Learning as We Go: An Examination of the Statistical Accuracy of COVID19 Daily Death Count Predictions Exploring the Effects of COVID-19 Containment Policies on Crime: An Empirical Analysis of the Short-term Aftermath in Los Angeles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1