Co-Administration of Vitamins C and E is Protective against Reserpine-induced Motor Impairment in Mice.

D. Timothy, J. Abdulazeez, A. Abdulwahab, Hassan-Danboyi Evelyn, Sadiq M. Muazu, Solomon N. Emmanuel, Yakubu B. Billy
{"title":"Co-Administration of Vitamins C and E is Protective against Reserpine-induced Motor Impairment in Mice.","authors":"D. Timothy, J. Abdulazeez, A. Abdulwahab, Hassan-Danboyi Evelyn, Sadiq M. Muazu, Solomon N. Emmanuel, Yakubu B. Billy","doi":"10.51658/abms.202122.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The conventional treatments for Parkinson's disease, the most common movement disorder globally, have not been able to halt its progression hence, newer approaches targeting its pathogenesis are being explored. We investigated the effect of vitamins C and E (in combination) on reserpine-induced motor impairment in mice. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five mice were randomly grouped into five groups of five mice each. All the groups except group I (control), were given an alternate days injection of reserpine 0.1 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Groups III and IV were administered vitamin E 200 mg/kg/day (vitamin E group), and vitamin C 250 mg/kg/day (vitamin C group), respectively while group V (co-administered group) was given both vitamins orally. Group II (reserpine group) received nothing in addition to reserpine. All drugs were given concurrently for 28 days. The neurobehavioral assessment was performed using beam walking and open field tasks. Results were presented as mean±SEM and statistical significance was placed at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant increases in a number of foot slips (3.60±0.68; p = 0.002) and the time spent in reaching the 'safe' platform (36.60±5.78 s; p = 0.0001) in the reserpine group, both of which were markedly reduced in the co-administered group (0.25±0.25 and 3.00±0.41s respectively). The co-administered group demonstrated a marked decrease in transfer latency (10.33±1.45s; p = 0.005) and crossed significantly more lines (56.00±13.53 lines; p = 0.0001) in the open field compared to the reserpine group (214.00±64.16s and 4.3±1.67 lines respectively). Conclusion: Co-administration of vitamins C and E protected against motor impairment induced by reserpine in mice.","PeriodicalId":330738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Basic and Medical Sciences","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Basic and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51658/abms.202122.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The conventional treatments for Parkinson's disease, the most common movement disorder globally, have not been able to halt its progression hence, newer approaches targeting its pathogenesis are being explored. We investigated the effect of vitamins C and E (in combination) on reserpine-induced motor impairment in mice. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five mice were randomly grouped into five groups of five mice each. All the groups except group I (control), were given an alternate days injection of reserpine 0.1 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Groups III and IV were administered vitamin E 200 mg/kg/day (vitamin E group), and vitamin C 250 mg/kg/day (vitamin C group), respectively while group V (co-administered group) was given both vitamins orally. Group II (reserpine group) received nothing in addition to reserpine. All drugs were given concurrently for 28 days. The neurobehavioral assessment was performed using beam walking and open field tasks. Results were presented as mean±SEM and statistical significance was placed at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant increases in a number of foot slips (3.60±0.68; p = 0.002) and the time spent in reaching the 'safe' platform (36.60±5.78 s; p = 0.0001) in the reserpine group, both of which were markedly reduced in the co-administered group (0.25±0.25 and 3.00±0.41s respectively). The co-administered group demonstrated a marked decrease in transfer latency (10.33±1.45s; p = 0.005) and crossed significantly more lines (56.00±13.53 lines; p = 0.0001) in the open field compared to the reserpine group (214.00±64.16s and 4.3±1.67 lines respectively). Conclusion: Co-administration of vitamins C and E protected against motor impairment induced by reserpine in mice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时给予维生素C和E对利血平诱导的小鼠运动损伤有保护作用。
背景:帕金森氏病是全球最常见的运动障碍,常规治疗方法无法阻止其进展,因此,针对其发病机制的新方法正在探索中。我们研究了维生素C和E(联合)对利血平引起的小鼠运动损伤的影响。材料与方法:25只小鼠随机分为5组,每组5只。除I组(对照组)外,其余各组小鼠均腹腔注射利血平0.1 mg/kg,每隔1天注射1次。III组和IV组分别给予维生素E 200 mg/kg/d(维生素E组)和维生素C 250 mg/kg/d(维生素C组),V组(联合给药组)给予两种维生素口服。第二组(利血平组)除利血平外不给药。所有药物同时给予28 d。神经行为评估采用光束行走和开阔场地任务进行。结果以均数±SEM表示,p < 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:足部滑倒次数明显增加(3.60±0.68;P = 0.002),到达“安全”平台所需时间(36.60±5.78 s;P = 0.0001),联合给药组两者均显著降低(分别为0.25±0.25和3.00±0.41s)。联合给药组小鼠转移潜伏期显著降低(10.33±1.45s);P = 0.005),且交叉株系较多(56.00±13.53;P = 0.0001),与利血平组相比(分别为214.00±64.16和4.3±1.67行)。结论:维生素C和维生素E对利血平所致小鼠运动损伤有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Proteinuria among Type 2 Diabetic Patients Attending Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria Surgical Management of Huge Uterine Fibroids in a Northern Nigerian Teaching Hospital Prevalence And Predictors of Unplanned Pregnancies among Married Women in Sokoto Metropolis, Northwest, Nigeria Concurrent Administration of the Methanol Leaf Extract of Leptadenia Hastata (Pers) Decne (Apocynaceae) With Metformin or Glibenclamide Influences Blood Glucose Handling in Normal Rats The Prevalence of Visual Acuity Impairment among Children in Nigeria – A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1