{"title":"WESTERNIZERS AND SLAVOPHILES REFLECTED IN RUSSIAN TRAVELS","authors":"V. Guminskii","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the paradox of the Russian social thought and literature, including the ambiguity of the historical images of Russian westernizers and slavophiles. The travel genre focused on the contrast between us and them. Two outstading Russian pieces of this genre (published almost simultaneously) contributed to the polemics of westernizers and slavophiles reflecting the inconsistencies of their positions. “Letters on Spain” by V.P. Botkin follows the idea, similar to slavophiles’, of the need to preserve the national identity under the conditions of modern (mid 19th century) globalization affecting the suburbs of the European world. The surprising unanimity shown by westernizers and slavophiles (essentialists) in their assessment of Monk Parfeny’s “Narrative of Travels.” gives us the opportunity to a have a new look at the essence of their debates regarding the future development of Russia and Russian literature (religious and national-historical aspects).","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article deals with the paradox of the Russian social thought and literature, including the ambiguity of the historical images of Russian westernizers and slavophiles. The travel genre focused on the contrast between us and them. Two outstading Russian pieces of this genre (published almost simultaneously) contributed to the polemics of westernizers and slavophiles reflecting the inconsistencies of their positions. “Letters on Spain” by V.P. Botkin follows the idea, similar to slavophiles’, of the need to preserve the national identity under the conditions of modern (mid 19th century) globalization affecting the suburbs of the European world. The surprising unanimity shown by westernizers and slavophiles (essentialists) in their assessment of Monk Parfeny’s “Narrative of Travels.” gives us the opportunity to a have a new look at the essence of their debates regarding the future development of Russia and Russian literature (religious and national-historical aspects).
文章论述了俄罗斯社会思想和文学的悖论,包括俄罗斯西化派和亲斯拉夫派历史形象的模糊性。旅行题材的电影关注的是我们和他们之间的对比。这一流派的两篇杰出的俄罗斯作品(几乎同时出版)促成了西化派和斯拉夫派的论战,反映了他们立场的不一致。博特金(V.P. Botkin)的《关于西班牙的信件》(Letters on Spain)遵循了类似于亲斯拉夫主义者的观点,即在影响欧洲世界郊区的现代(19世纪中期)全球化的条件下,有必要保护国家身份。西化派和斯拉夫派(本质主义者)在评价僧侣帕芬尼的《游记》时表现出惊人的一致。让我们有机会重新审视他们关于俄罗斯和俄罗斯文学(宗教和民族历史方面)未来发展的辩论的本质。