Friday Morning Fever. Evidence from a Randomized Experiment on Sick Leave Monitoring in the Public Sector

T. Boeri, Edoardo Di Porto, Paolo Naticchioni, Vincenzo Scrutinio
{"title":"Friday Morning Fever. Evidence from a Randomized Experiment on Sick Leave Monitoring in the Public Sector","authors":"T. Boeri, Edoardo Di Porto, Paolo Naticchioni, Vincenzo Scrutinio","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3846690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides the first analysis of a population-wide controlled field experiment for home visits checking on sick leave in the public sector. The experiment was carried out in Italy, a country with large absenteeism in the public sector, and it concerned the universe of public employees. We exploit unique administrative data from the Italian social security administration (INPS) on sick leave and work histories. We find that receiving a home visit reduces the number of days on sick leave in the following 16 months by about 12 % (5.5 days). The effect is stronger for workers who are found irregularly on sick leave (-10.2 days). We interpret our findings as a deterrence effect of home visits: workers being found irregularly on sick leave experience a decline of about 2 % of their wage in the following 12 months. Uncertainty aversion (there is no automatism in these sanctions) can play a role in these results. Our estimates suggest that home visits are cost-effective: every Euro spent for the visits involves up to 10 Euros reductions in sick benefits outlays. We estimate the marginal value of public funds (MVPF) spent on home visits at about 1.13, which is significantly lower than estimates of MVPF of income taxes in the US.","PeriodicalId":121231,"journal":{"name":"CEPR Discussion Paper Series","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR Discussion Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3846690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides the first analysis of a population-wide controlled field experiment for home visits checking on sick leave in the public sector. The experiment was carried out in Italy, a country with large absenteeism in the public sector, and it concerned the universe of public employees. We exploit unique administrative data from the Italian social security administration (INPS) on sick leave and work histories. We find that receiving a home visit reduces the number of days on sick leave in the following 16 months by about 12 % (5.5 days). The effect is stronger for workers who are found irregularly on sick leave (-10.2 days). We interpret our findings as a deterrence effect of home visits: workers being found irregularly on sick leave experience a decline of about 2 % of their wage in the following 12 months. Uncertainty aversion (there is no automatism in these sanctions) can play a role in these results. Our estimates suggest that home visits are cost-effective: every Euro spent for the visits involves up to 10 Euros reductions in sick benefits outlays. We estimate the marginal value of public funds (MVPF) spent on home visits at about 1.13, which is significantly lower than estimates of MVPF of income taxes in the US.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周五早晨狂热。公共部门病假监测的随机实验证据
本文首次分析了公共部门病假家访检查的人群控制现场实验。这项实验是在意大利进行的,这个国家的公共部门缺勤率很高,它涉及到所有的公共雇员。我们利用独特的管理数据,从意大利社会保障管理局(INPS)的病假和工作历史。我们发现,接受家访后,在接下来的16个月里,病假天数减少了约12%(5.5天)。对不定期请病假(-10.2天)的员工影响更大。我们将我们的研究结果解释为家访的威慑效应:被发现不定期请病假的工人在接下来的12个月里工资下降了约2%。对不确定性的厌恶(在这些制裁中没有自动行为)可以在这些结果中发挥作用。我们的估计表明,家访具有成本效益:在家访中每花费一欧元,就会减少多达10欧元的疾病福利支出。我们估计用于家访的公共资金(MVPF)的边际价值约为1.13,这明显低于美国所得税的MVPF估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Friday Morning Fever. Evidence from a Randomized Experiment on Sick Leave Monitoring in the Public Sector Trade, Jobs, and Worker Welfare Fiscal Policy Challenges for Latin America During the Next Stages of the Pandemic: The Need for a Fiscal Pact Bayesian Estimation of Epidemiological Models: Methods, Causality, and Policy Trade-Offs Evaluating Deliberative Competence: A Simple Method with an Application to Financial Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1