The Changing landscapes of Ankara

Selin Çavdar Sert, Funda Baş Bütüner
{"title":"The Changing landscapes of Ankara","authors":"Selin Çavdar Sert, Funda Baş Bütüner","doi":"10.53910/26531313-e2020801482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThis article offers a critical reading of the changing landscapes of Ankara, exposing the still existing potential for framing integrative urban strategy-making. Ankara has undergone intense urban expansion since the 1950s, and like other cities, it is still dealing with large scale construction/destruction engendering dramatic landscape loss in various contexts and scales. Although change in the landscape is typical of urbanization, nature and landscape were largely undervalued in the implementation of urban development strategies in Ankara. Contradicting per capita green space policies, the well-structured urban landscape, including both natural and planned/designed landscapes from the Republican Period were fragmented and reduced. Valleys creating corridors for fresh air and offering a reserve for agriculture were engulfed by squatter houses, then by new housing projects; streams, defining a blue infrastructure accompanied by fertile lands were partially covered over or canalized. Furthermore, the landscape heritage of the early Republican Period, which played a key role in the modernization of societal and urban life, was also undervalued, while the urban park system has been diminished. This article identifies representative examples of fragmentation and loss of the landscape fabric, as well as the latent potential of the landscape to articulate a sustainability agenda for Ankara.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":394584,"journal":{"name":"Ekistics and The New Habitat","volume":"55 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekistics and The New Habitat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53910/26531313-e2020801482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article offers a critical reading of the changing landscapes of Ankara, exposing the still existing potential for framing integrative urban strategy-making. Ankara has undergone intense urban expansion since the 1950s, and like other cities, it is still dealing with large scale construction/destruction engendering dramatic landscape loss in various contexts and scales. Although change in the landscape is typical of urbanization, nature and landscape were largely undervalued in the implementation of urban development strategies in Ankara. Contradicting per capita green space policies, the well-structured urban landscape, including both natural and planned/designed landscapes from the Republican Period were fragmented and reduced. Valleys creating corridors for fresh air and offering a reserve for agriculture were engulfed by squatter houses, then by new housing projects; streams, defining a blue infrastructure accompanied by fertile lands were partially covered over or canalized. Furthermore, the landscape heritage of the early Republican Period, which played a key role in the modernization of societal and urban life, was also undervalued, while the urban park system has been diminished. This article identifies representative examples of fragmentation and loss of the landscape fabric, as well as the latent potential of the landscape to articulate a sustainability agenda for Ankara.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安卡拉不断变化的景观
本文对安卡拉不断变化的景观进行了批判性解读,揭示了构建综合城市战略制定的潜力。自20世纪50年代以来,安卡拉经历了激烈的城市扩张,像其他城市一样,它仍然在处理大规模的建设/破坏,在各种背景和规模上造成了巨大的景观损失。虽然景观的变化是城市化的典型特征,但在安卡拉实施城市发展战略时,自然和景观在很大程度上被低估了。与人均绿地政策相矛盾的是,民国时期结构良好的城市景观,包括自然景观和规划/设计景观,都变得支离破碎和减少。为新鲜空气提供通道和为农业提供储备的山谷被棚户区吞没,然后是新的住房项目;河流,定义了一个蓝色的基础设施,伴随着肥沃的土地,部分被覆盖或运河化。此外,民国初期的景观遗产在社会和城市生活的现代化中发挥了关键作用,但也被低估了,而城市公园系统也被削弱了。本文确定了景观结构破碎和丧失的代表性例子,以及景观的潜在潜力,以阐明安卡拉的可持续发展议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Story in Memory of Panayis Psomopoulos The Demolition at Porto Rafti: Retracing Doxiadis’ Remarkable Life and Contested Legacy Editor's Desk. As a Byzantine Eagle Doxiadis and His Legacy: Retrospective of the Lebanon Case - From Sketch to Stretch Ekistics as a Place Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1