The Application of the Doctrine of Res Judicata in Political Rights Cases: National Freedom Party v Electoral Commission and Others (2016)

Angelo Dube, Musavengana Machaya
{"title":"The Application of the Doctrine of Res Judicata in Political Rights Cases: National Freedom Party v Electoral Commission and Others (2016)","authors":"Angelo Dube, Musavengana Machaya","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V20I1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 5 August 2016, the Electoral Court delivered its judgment in the case of National Freedom Party v The Electoral Commission and Others (NFP No 2) and dismissed an application by the National Freedom Party (NFP) to retrospectively amend the electoral timetable. This second case followed an unsuccessful earlier attempt to seek a similar order in the same court in the case of National Freedom Party v Electoral Commission and Another (NFP No 1). In the case under discussion (NFP No 2), the second to seventh respondents were all registered political parties that indicated in their founding affidavit that they supported the cause of the NFP to be included in the 2016 municipal elections.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V20I1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 5 August 2016, the Electoral Court delivered its judgment in the case of National Freedom Party v The Electoral Commission and Others (NFP No 2) and dismissed an application by the National Freedom Party (NFP) to retrospectively amend the electoral timetable. This second case followed an unsuccessful earlier attempt to seek a similar order in the same court in the case of National Freedom Party v Electoral Commission and Another (NFP No 1). In the case under discussion (NFP No 2), the second to seventh respondents were all registered political parties that indicated in their founding affidavit that they supported the cause of the NFP to be included in the 2016 municipal elections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既判力原则在政治权利案件中的适用:国家自由党诉选举委员会等(2016)
2016年8月5日,选举法院就民族自由党诉选举委员会及其他人案(NFP No . 2)作出判决,并驳回了民族自由党要求追溯修改选举时间表的申请。在第二起案件之前,在国家自由党诉选举委员会和另一个(NFP第1号)的案件中,在同一法院寻求类似命令的尝试失败。在正在讨论的案件中(NFP第2号),第二到第七名被告都是注册政党,他们在其创始宣誓书中表示,他们支持将NFP纳入2016年市政选举的事业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1