[No effect of injection volume on sensory and motor blockade in isobaric spinal anesthesia].

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-09-01
E Lanz, D Schmitz
{"title":"[No effect of injection volume on sensory and motor blockade in isobaric spinal anesthesia].","authors":"E Lanz,&nbsp;D Schmitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors were interested to find whether the course of sensory and motor blockade in isobaric spinal anesthesia was determined by the dose or the volume of the anesthetic agent. In a randomized double-blind study in 60 patients, each underwent isobaric spinal anesthesia with 17.5 mg bupivacaine. In three groups of 20 patients, this dose was administered as 3.5 mg bupivacaine 0.5%, 7 ml bupivacaine 0.25% or 10 ml bupivacaine 0.175%. The development, spread and regression of sensory block (anesthesia, analgesia) and motor block (Bromage scale, rectus abdominis muscle test) were determined. The clinical data recorded in the three groups were comparable. The rate of development, the maximal spread or intensity, and the regression of sensory and motor blockade did not differ in the three groups. The only difference was that the complete regression was shorter following 10 ml bupivacaine 0.175% (P less than 0.05). It is therefore concluded that the dose, and not the volume, determines the course of sensory and motor blockade of isobaric spinal anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 7","pages":"153-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors were interested to find whether the course of sensory and motor blockade in isobaric spinal anesthesia was determined by the dose or the volume of the anesthetic agent. In a randomized double-blind study in 60 patients, each underwent isobaric spinal anesthesia with 17.5 mg bupivacaine. In three groups of 20 patients, this dose was administered as 3.5 mg bupivacaine 0.5%, 7 ml bupivacaine 0.25% or 10 ml bupivacaine 0.175%. The development, spread and regression of sensory block (anesthesia, analgesia) and motor block (Bromage scale, rectus abdominis muscle test) were determined. The clinical data recorded in the three groups were comparable. The rate of development, the maximal spread or intensity, and the regression of sensory and motor blockade did not differ in the three groups. The only difference was that the complete regression was shorter following 10 ml bupivacaine 0.175% (P less than 0.05). It is therefore concluded that the dose, and not the volume, determines the course of sensory and motor blockade of isobaric spinal anesthesia.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[注射量对等压腰麻感觉和运动阻滞无影响]。
作者感兴趣的是,在等压脊髓麻醉中,感觉和运动阻滞的过程是否由麻醉剂的剂量或体积决定。在一项随机双盲研究中,60名患者接受17.5 mg布比卡因等压脊髓麻醉。在三组20例患者中,该剂量分别为3.5 mg布比卡因0.5%,7 ml布比卡因0.25%或10 ml布比卡因0.175%。观察感觉阻滞(麻醉、镇痛)和运动阻滞(Bromage量表、腹直肌试验)的发展、扩散和消退。三组临床资料具有可比性。三组的发展速度、最大范围或强度、感觉和运动阻断的消退无显著差异。唯一不同的是,当布比卡因浓度为0.175%时,完全回归时间较短(P < 0.05)。因此,我们认为是剂量而不是体积决定了等压脊髓麻醉的感觉和运动阻滞的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1