Dos enfoques energéticos que dominan y liberan el medioambiente en un proyecto de arquitectura

Abstract

In a first energy model, the geodesic dome of R.B. Fuller, focused on the problem of how cover the maximum space with the minimum of energy, is made of many air molecules, such as “The Cardboard House” project where he explained the same items in a smaller scale. Because of the influence of the ballistic and navigation studies, the air solution, which is represented by several soft corpuscles and likely to support compression strength, is replaced with water solution, which is made by corpuscles too, but such as small steel balls that are not be able to afford compression strength sliding one each other without taking up tangential stresses. In these studies, geometry is a working tool of prevention and measure of unexpected forces of nature, calculating in advance the energy events through time. In a second energy model, a conexion is established by contiguity and not by formal association with the principle of automorphism of R. Le Ricolais through two infrastuctural projects adapted to different enviroments, one is aereal “Sky-Rail” and the other aquatic “Under Sea Transit”, showing how small glasses and microorganisms without gravity lead to building principles of new energy systems like artificial islands. Le Ricolais said that together with life comes the problem of growth, and until now man has not been capable of making machines that grow. About future structural projects, some thoughful approches for the future are alternated between the utilization of state-of-art technologies and no technology at all, between seeking total control of environment and abandoning all modes of control.