Taking Stock of the Impact of Power Utility Reform in Developing Countries: A Literature Review

R. Bacon
{"title":"Taking Stock of the Impact of Power Utility Reform in Developing Countries: A Literature Review","authors":"R. Bacon","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-8460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews recent literature on the impacts of various components of power sector reform on the performance of electric utilities in developing countries. Recent literature is heavily focused on statistical testing of the significance of the links between four components of sector reform (unbundling, private sector participation, regulation, and competition) and various performance indicators (relating to utility performance, user outcomes, and broader economic development). Some studies exhibit methodological shortcomings in failing to account for interactions between reforms or degrees of reform; however, others appear to be robust. The strongest result is that the introduction of private sector participation is linked to a significant improvement in labor productivity and distribution losses. Moreover, unbundling reforms in isolation is found to have hardly any significant impact on utility performance. The introduction of an independent regulator or competition is not generally significant across studies. A notable feature of all of the studies is very limited testing of the effects of policy introduction on performance indicators, such as bill collection and the duration and frequency of outages. Poor performance on these indicators of state-owned power companies is well documented and bill collection has been identified as a major hidden cost of unreformed power sectors. The materiality of the impact of private sector participation, on the various performance indictors found to be significant, is calculated for studies that provide sufficient information to do so. The size of the impact of private sector participation on utility performance is substantial in a couple of studies, although much more modest in others.","PeriodicalId":113748,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This paper reviews recent literature on the impacts of various components of power sector reform on the performance of electric utilities in developing countries. Recent literature is heavily focused on statistical testing of the significance of the links between four components of sector reform (unbundling, private sector participation, regulation, and competition) and various performance indicators (relating to utility performance, user outcomes, and broader economic development). Some studies exhibit methodological shortcomings in failing to account for interactions between reforms or degrees of reform; however, others appear to be robust. The strongest result is that the introduction of private sector participation is linked to a significant improvement in labor productivity and distribution losses. Moreover, unbundling reforms in isolation is found to have hardly any significant impact on utility performance. The introduction of an independent regulator or competition is not generally significant across studies. A notable feature of all of the studies is very limited testing of the effects of policy introduction on performance indicators, such as bill collection and the duration and frequency of outages. Poor performance on these indicators of state-owned power companies is well documented and bill collection has been identified as a major hidden cost of unreformed power sectors. The materiality of the impact of private sector participation, on the various performance indictors found to be significant, is calculated for studies that provide sufficient information to do so. The size of the impact of private sector participation on utility performance is substantial in a couple of studies, although much more modest in others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估发展中国家电力公用事业改革的影响:文献综述
本文回顾了最近关于电力部门改革的各个组成部分对发展中国家电力公用事业绩效影响的文献。最近的文献主要集中在部门改革的四个组成部分(分拆、私营部门参与、监管和竞争)与各种绩效指标(与公用事业绩效、用户结果和更广泛的经济发展有关)之间联系的重要性的统计测试上。一些研究显示出方法上的缺陷,未能解释改革或改革程度之间的相互作用;然而,其他国家似乎表现强劲。最有力的结果是,引入私营部门参与与劳动生产率和分配损失的显著改善有关。此外,发现单独的分拆改革对公用事业绩效几乎没有任何重大影响。引入独立监管机构或竞争在研究中通常意义不大。所有这些研究的一个显著特点是非常有限地测试政策实施对业绩指标的影响,例如收取账单和停电的持续时间和频率。国有电力公司在这些指标上的表现不佳是有据可查的,电费催收已被确定为未改革电力部门的主要隐性成本。私营部门参与对被认为重要的各种业绩指标的影响的重要性,是根据提供足够资料的研究来计算的。在一些研究中,私营部门参与对公用事业绩效的影响是巨大的,尽管在其他研究中要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Public Financing: Crowding Out in the Context of Political Campaigns Targeting Interacting Agents I divari infrastrutturali in Italia: una misurazione caso per caso [Infrastructure Gaps in Italy: A Case-by-Case Measurement] Do 'Dig Once' and Permitting Policies Improve Fiber Availability? Opioids and Organs: How Overdoses Affect the Supply and Demand for Organ Transplants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1