A physics/engineering of failure based analysis and tool for quantifying residual risks in hardware

S. Cornford, M. Gibbel, M. Feather, D. Oberhettinger
{"title":"A physics/engineering of failure based analysis and tool for quantifying residual risks in hardware","authors":"S. Cornford, M. Gibbel, M. Feather, D. Oberhettinger","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2000.816338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NASA Code Q is supporting efforts to improve the verification and validation and the risk management processes for spaceflight projects. A physics-of-failure based Defect Detection and Prevention (DDP) methodology previously developed has been integrated into a software tool and is currently being implemented on various NASA projects and as part of NASA's new model-based spacecraft development environment. The DDP methodology begins with prioritizing the risks (or failure modes, FMs) relevant to a mission which need to be addressed. These risks can be reduced through the implementation of a set of detection and prevention activities referred to herein as PACTs (preventative measures, analyses, process controls and tests). Each of these PACTs has some effectiveness against one or more FMs but also has an associated resource cost. The FMs can be weighted according to their likelihood of occurrence and their mission impact should they occur. The net effectiveness of various combinations of PACTs can then be evaluated against these weighted FMs to obtain the residual risk for each of these FMs and the associated resource costs to achieve these risk levels. The process thus identifies the project-relevant \"tall pole\" FMs and design drivers and allows real time tailoring with the evolution of the design and technology content. The DDP methodology allows risk management in its truest sense: it identifies and assesses risk, provides options and tools for risk decision making and mitigation and allows for real-time tracking of current risk status.","PeriodicalId":178321,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2000.816338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

NASA Code Q is supporting efforts to improve the verification and validation and the risk management processes for spaceflight projects. A physics-of-failure based Defect Detection and Prevention (DDP) methodology previously developed has been integrated into a software tool and is currently being implemented on various NASA projects and as part of NASA's new model-based spacecraft development environment. The DDP methodology begins with prioritizing the risks (or failure modes, FMs) relevant to a mission which need to be addressed. These risks can be reduced through the implementation of a set of detection and prevention activities referred to herein as PACTs (preventative measures, analyses, process controls and tests). Each of these PACTs has some effectiveness against one or more FMs but also has an associated resource cost. The FMs can be weighted according to their likelihood of occurrence and their mission impact should they occur. The net effectiveness of various combinations of PACTs can then be evaluated against these weighted FMs to obtain the residual risk for each of these FMs and the associated resource costs to achieve these risk levels. The process thus identifies the project-relevant "tall pole" FMs and design drivers and allows real time tailoring with the evolution of the design and technology content. The DDP methodology allows risk management in its truest sense: it identifies and assesses risk, provides options and tools for risk decision making and mitigation and allows for real-time tracking of current risk status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于故障分析的物理/工程,用于量化硬件残留风险的工具
NASA代码Q正在支持改进航天项目的验证和确认以及风险管理过程的努力。先前开发的基于故障物理的缺陷检测和预防(DDP)方法已经集成到一个软件工具中,目前正在NASA的各种项目中实施,并作为NASA新的基于模型的航天器开发环境的一部分。DDP方法首先对需要解决的任务相关的风险(或故障模式,FMs)进行优先排序。这些风险可以通过实施一套检测和预防活动来减少,这些活动在这里被称为PACTs(预防性措施、分析、过程控制和测试)。这些pact中的每一个对一个或多个fm都有一定的有效性,但也有相关的资源成本。FMs可以根据其发生的可能性和发生时对任务的影响进行加权。然后可以根据这些加权FMs来评估各种pact组合的净有效性,以获得每个FMs的剩余风险和达到这些风险水平的相关资源成本。因此,该过程确定了与项目相关的“高杆”FMs和设计驱动因素,并允许根据设计和技术内容的演变进行实时裁剪。DDP方法实现了真正意义上的风险管理:它识别和评估风险,为风险决策和减轻风险提供选择和工具,并允许实时跟踪当前风险状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to enhance reliability of electronic systems through effective modeling and risk assessment Evaluating the residual risks of infusing new technologies into NASA missions Advisory board - tools for reliability and maintainability practitioners Use of fault tree analysis for evaluation of system-reliability improvements in design phase Power-related failure mechanisms in the analysis of wireless system availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1