R WE LOUD ENOUGH?: Re-inscribing monuments in the public sphere by the Black Lives Matter movement

Jim Brogden, Douglas Harper
{"title":"R WE LOUD ENOUGH?: Re-inscribing monuments in the public sphere by the Black Lives Matter movement","authors":"Jim Brogden, Douglas Harper","doi":"10.1386/aps_00047_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article applies a multimodal analysis to explore the potential meanings attached to the re-inscriptions of public monuments and spaces produced during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Specific attention is given to several contentious examples: the George Floyd Memorial in Minneapolis, Winston Churchill’s statue in London, and the Queen Victoria statue in Leeds. We reflect on the ephemerality of protest re-inscriptions and how they receive a multimodal ‘second-life’ through their (re)presentations in mainstream/social media. Although institutions of power are quick to remove subversive re-inscriptions from the public sphere, we note that the portrait mural of George Floyd continues to function as a universal shrine to the injustices experienced by the wider Black community. A memorial space which is allowed to linger until its promised transubstantiation into George Perry Floyd Jr Place. In contrast, the other BLM re-inscriptions analysed in this article have now been removed from the physical public sphere, in which their transient messages of protest and public pedagogy will have in some cases been privately and publicly archived digitally on the internet; where evidence is much harder to remove than the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00047_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article applies a multimodal analysis to explore the potential meanings attached to the re-inscriptions of public monuments and spaces produced during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Specific attention is given to several contentious examples: the George Floyd Memorial in Minneapolis, Winston Churchill’s statue in London, and the Queen Victoria statue in Leeds. We reflect on the ephemerality of protest re-inscriptions and how they receive a multimodal ‘second-life’ through their (re)presentations in mainstream/social media. Although institutions of power are quick to remove subversive re-inscriptions from the public sphere, we note that the portrait mural of George Floyd continues to function as a universal shrine to the injustices experienced by the wider Black community. A memorial space which is allowed to linger until its promised transubstantiation into George Perry Floyd Jr Place. In contrast, the other BLM re-inscriptions analysed in this article have now been removed from the physical public sphere, in which their transient messages of protest and public pedagogy will have in some cases been privately and publicly archived digitally on the internet; where evidence is much harder to remove than the public sphere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的声音够大吗?:“黑人的命也是命”运动在公共领域重新铭刻纪念碑
本文采用多模态分析来探讨2020年“黑人的命也是命”抗议活动期间产生的公共纪念碑和空间重新铭文的潜在含义。特别关注几个有争议的例子:明尼阿波利斯的乔治·弗洛伊德纪念碑,伦敦的温斯顿·丘吉尔雕像和利兹的维多利亚女王雕像。我们反思抗议重新铭文的短暂性,以及它们如何通过在主流/社交媒体上的(重新)呈现获得多模式的“第二次生命”。虽然权力机构很快就会从公共领域移除颠覆性的重新铭文,但我们注意到,乔治·弗洛伊德的肖像壁画继续作为一个普遍的圣地,纪念更广泛的黑人社区所经历的不公正。一个纪念空间,被允许逗留,直到它承诺转化为小乔治·佩里·弗洛伊德广场。相比之下,本文分析的其他BLM重新铭文现在已经从实体公共领域中删除,其中他们的抗议和公共教育的短暂信息将在某些情况下被私人或公开地存档在互联网上;那里的证据比公共领域更难移除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art, politics, pedagogy: Juxtaposing, discomfiting, disrupting The case for creative folklore in pedagogical practice Paying it forward to end period poverty in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Pedagogies and politics of care, community, and academic activism Teaching urban spaces and world politics: Perdido Street Station and pedagogies of production Conflictual sociability? A paradoxical approach to politicized street theatre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1