Efficacy and Side Effects of Single Agent Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Older and Younger Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

{"title":"Efficacy and Side Effects of Single Agent Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Older and Younger Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.51626/ijor.2021.02.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer related death and more common in older people. Immunotherapy has improved\nefficacy compared to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to review existing data on efficacy and adverse\nevents (AEs) of single agent immunotherapy for NSCLC by age. We reported OS, progression-free survival (PFS) and AEs by age. Suitable\nresults were meta-analysed using the random effects model. 1803 papers were screened, ten eligible papers identified, seven included\nin meta-analyses. Included individual papers did not demonstrate a difference in OS, PFS or AEs. Meta-analyses showed no significant\ndifference in OS (HR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15; p=0.58), PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.01; p=0.15) or AEs (HR:1.01 95% CI:0.83-1.23;\np=0.91) in older vs younger patients. Existing data on differences in efficacy and AEs of immunotherapy by age is largely observational\nand points to similar efficacy and adverse events by age.","PeriodicalId":247564,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51626/ijor.2021.02.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer related death and more common in older people. Immunotherapy has improved efficacy compared to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to review existing data on efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of single agent immunotherapy for NSCLC by age. We reported OS, progression-free survival (PFS) and AEs by age. Suitable results were meta-analysed using the random effects model. 1803 papers were screened, ten eligible papers identified, seven included in meta-analyses. Included individual papers did not demonstrate a difference in OS, PFS or AEs. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in OS (HR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15; p=0.58), PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.01; p=0.15) or AEs (HR:1.01 95% CI:0.83-1.23; p=0.91) in older vs younger patients. Existing data on differences in efficacy and AEs of immunotherapy by age is largely observational and points to similar efficacy and adverse events by age.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单药免疫治疗老年和年轻非小细胞肺癌的疗效和副作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析
肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,在老年人中更为常见。与化疗相比,免疫治疗在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的疗效有所提高。我们的目的是回顾按年龄划分的单药免疫治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和不良事件(ae)的现有数据。我们按年龄报告了OS、无进展生存期(PFS)和ae。采用随机效应模型对合适的结果进行meta分析。筛选了1803篇论文,确定了10篇符合条件的论文,其中7篇纳入meta分析。纳入的个别论文在OS、PFS或ae方面没有表现出差异。meta分析显示OS无显著差异(HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15;p=0.58), PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.01;p=0.15)或ae (HR:1.01 95% CI:0.83-1.23;p=0.91)。关于不同年龄免疫治疗的疗效和不良事件差异的现有数据主要是观察性的,并且指出不同年龄的疗效和不良事件相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Field Cancerization: A Review with Case Reports Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor to the Omentum and Endometrium: A Case Report Digital Pathology Implementation can Help Alleviate Limited Pathology Services in Developing Countries Carcinoma Ex Combined Inverted and Oncocytic Types Sinonasal Papilloma with Multifocal Severe Dysplasia: A Case Report Diffuse Midline Glioma H3 K27-Mutant in an Adult: A Rare Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1