The Relationship of Nurse Therapeutic Communication with Anxiety among Rheumatoid Patients

Genius Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-22 DOI:10.56359/gj.v3i1.24
A. Gunawan, Nadya Salsabilla, Fitriani Fajriah, Nurshofi Intansari, Haryani, Maulidah Noor Sofia, Noneng Nuraida, Ikna Cahyadi Kurniawan
{"title":"The Relationship of Nurse Therapeutic Communication with Anxiety among Rheumatoid Patients","authors":"A. Gunawan, Nadya Salsabilla, Fitriani Fajriah, Nurshofi Intansari, Haryani, Maulidah Noor Sofia, Noneng Nuraida, Ikna Cahyadi Kurniawan","doi":"10.56359/gj.v3i1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study uses a descriptive correlational quantitative method with a cross-sectional approach to determine whether there is a relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara Health Center.\nMethod: This study uses a descriptive correlational quantitative method with a cross-sectional approach to determine whether there is a relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara Health Center. The population in this study were rheumatism sufferers as many as 119 people in the Jatinagara Health Center area using accidental sampling technique with a sample of 31 people. This study uses primary data or data obtained directly from the object of research by distributing anxiety questionnaires, namely Hamilton Rating Scale For Anxiety (HARS) and therapeutic communication questionnaires which were analyzed using statistical analysis applications, namely SPSS for windows with Chi-Square test.\nResult: The results of the study obtained respondents who obtained the following results from 31 respondents who received good therapeutic communication, namely 19 respondents (61.3%) and those who received poor communication were as many as 12 respondents (38.7%). Of the 19 respondents who received therapeutic communication (61.3%) of them there was no anxiety as many as 11 people (57.9%) and of the 12 respondents who received poor therapeutic communication, there were 3 respondents (25.0) who had severe anxiety. Based on table 2.4, the chi-square results show p-value = 0.081 > (0.05).\nConclusion: based on research that has been done the results obtained show that the relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara community health center is not effective.","PeriodicalId":446304,"journal":{"name":"Genius Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genius Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56359/gj.v3i1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study uses a descriptive correlational quantitative method with a cross-sectional approach to determine whether there is a relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara Health Center. Method: This study uses a descriptive correlational quantitative method with a cross-sectional approach to determine whether there is a relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara Health Center. The population in this study were rheumatism sufferers as many as 119 people in the Jatinagara Health Center area using accidental sampling technique with a sample of 31 people. This study uses primary data or data obtained directly from the object of research by distributing anxiety questionnaires, namely Hamilton Rating Scale For Anxiety (HARS) and therapeutic communication questionnaires which were analyzed using statistical analysis applications, namely SPSS for windows with Chi-Square test. Result: The results of the study obtained respondents who obtained the following results from 31 respondents who received good therapeutic communication, namely 19 respondents (61.3%) and those who received poor communication were as many as 12 respondents (38.7%). Of the 19 respondents who received therapeutic communication (61.3%) of them there was no anxiety as many as 11 people (57.9%) and of the 12 respondents who received poor therapeutic communication, there were 3 respondents (25.0) who had severe anxiety. Based on table 2.4, the chi-square results show p-value = 0.081 > (0.05). Conclusion: based on research that has been done the results obtained show that the relationship between therapeutic communication and anxiety in rheumatic patients at the Jatinagara community health center is not effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿患者护理沟通与焦虑的关系
目的:本研究采用描述性相关定量方法和横断面方法来确定Jatinagara健康中心风湿病患者的治疗沟通与焦虑之间是否存在关系。方法:本研究采用描述性相关定量方法和横断面方法来确定Jatinagara健康中心风湿病患者的治疗沟通与焦虑之间是否存在关系。本研究的人群是Jatinagara健康中心地区的119名风湿病患者,使用了31人的偶然抽样技术。本研究使用原始数据或直接从研究对象获得的数据,通过发放焦虑问卷,即汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HARS)和治疗性沟通问卷,使用SPSS统计分析软件进行分析,窗口采用卡方检验。结果:研究结果获得的被调查者中,31名被调查者中治疗沟通良好的19名(61.3%),沟通不良的多达12名(38.7%)。在接受治疗性沟通的19名应答者(61.3%)中,无焦虑者达11人(57.9%),在12名治疗性沟通不佳的应答者中,有3名应答者(25.0)有严重焦虑。由表2.4可知,卡方结果显示p值= 0.081 >(0.05)。结论:根据已有的研究结果显示,在Jatinagara社区卫生中心,治疗沟通与风湿病患者焦虑之间的关系并不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of E-FAS on the Knowledge of Post-partum Nursing Profession in Times of War and Humanity: Insights from Siti Rufaidah's Legacy Nutritional Status and Lifestyle Factors Contributing to the Regulation of Reproductive Quality in Adolescent Females Knowledge Regarding Reproductive Health among Adolescent The Relationship between Knowledge Level and Fire Disaster Preparedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1