Equality Lost: John Locke and the United States 1986 Tax Reform

J. Feldmann
{"title":"Equality Lost: John Locke and the United States 1986 Tax Reform","authors":"J. Feldmann","doi":"10.5325/soundings.105.1.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay traces the displacement of the equality ideal and progressive taxation from the US tax code in the 1980s. After a brief background on the origin of the equality ideal and the current vast income and wealth disparities, the article examines the political process and philosophical premises of the 1986 tax reform. It shows how \"supply side\" tax arguments made their way into and ultimately prevailed in Congressional deliberations, a success resting in part on Robert Nozick's misinterpretations of John Locke's entitlement and taxation theories. The article then counters the Nozickian interpretation with biographical and textual evidence of Locke's egalitarian commitments.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/soundings.105.1.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay traces the displacement of the equality ideal and progressive taxation from the US tax code in the 1980s. After a brief background on the origin of the equality ideal and the current vast income and wealth disparities, the article examines the political process and philosophical premises of the 1986 tax reform. It shows how "supply side" tax arguments made their way into and ultimately prevailed in Congressional deliberations, a success resting in part on Robert Nozick's misinterpretations of John Locke's entitlement and taxation theories. The article then counters the Nozickian interpretation with biographical and textual evidence of Locke's egalitarian commitments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《失去平等:约翰·洛克与美国1986年税制改革》
摘要:本文追溯了20世纪80年代美国税法中平等理想和累进税制的变迁。在简要介绍了平等理想的起源和当前巨大的收入和财富差距的背景之后,本文考察了1986年税收改革的政治过程和哲学前提。它展示了“供给侧”税收论点是如何进入并最终在国会审议中占了上风的,这一成功部分取决于罗伯特·诺齐克对约翰·洛克的权利和税收理论的误解。文章随后用洛克平等主义承诺的传记和文本证据来反驳诺齐克的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tribalism and Compassion in the Age of a Pandemic The Specter of the Amazon: FEMEN's Utopian Reappropriation of the Female Breast Editor's Introduction Unruly Audience: Folk Interventions in Popular Media Gods, Games, and Globalization: New Perspectives on Religion and Sport ed. by Rebecca T. Alpert and Arthur Remillard (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1