Reconfigurations of Security: Governing Heroin Users in Frankfurt am Main, 1975–1995

Sebastian Haus
{"title":"Reconfigurations of Security: Governing Heroin Users in Frankfurt am Main, 1975–1995","authors":"Sebastian Haus","doi":"10.5771/9783845293547-325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, the city of Frankfurt am Main is widely known as one of the first major cities in Germany having adopted so-called “harm reduction” policies towards heroin users. Rather than repressing or forcing users towards abstinence, the city administration primarily focuses on reducing the risks of drug use and on stabilizing the health of addicts with a multi-faceted series of measures such as safe injection sites, methadone maintenance programs, legal advice services, and assisted housing projects. Praising “Frankfurt’s path in drug politics” as a “role model for many municipalities at home and abroad,” the city administration highlights that its drug policy has the double effect of not only improving the situation of drug addicts but also contributing to the “protection of citizens.”1 Considering social and medical assistances for heroin users as measures to improve citizens’ security resonates in many ways with the long and complex history of controlling the city’s heroin scene. Since the 1970s, Frankfurt am Main, as well as many other cities across Europe, have had to cope with the increasing presence of heroin users in the urban public space. The consumption of so-called “hard drugs” such as heroin as well as its spatial manifestations, the public gatherings of drug-consuming youth in plain sight for passersby, attracted strong media attention and caused a moral panic about the radical delinquency of teenage heroin users. The local authorities in Frankfurt considered heroin addicts as both threats to urban security and ill persons in need of medical and psychological care, therefore necessitating not only criminal persecution by the police, but also social service measures by the city administration. Consequently, the logics of governing the heroin scene oscillated between coer1","PeriodicalId":318436,"journal":{"name":"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845293547-325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, the city of Frankfurt am Main is widely known as one of the first major cities in Germany having adopted so-called “harm reduction” policies towards heroin users. Rather than repressing or forcing users towards abstinence, the city administration primarily focuses on reducing the risks of drug use and on stabilizing the health of addicts with a multi-faceted series of measures such as safe injection sites, methadone maintenance programs, legal advice services, and assisted housing projects. Praising “Frankfurt’s path in drug politics” as a “role model for many municipalities at home and abroad,” the city administration highlights that its drug policy has the double effect of not only improving the situation of drug addicts but also contributing to the “protection of citizens.”1 Considering social and medical assistances for heroin users as measures to improve citizens’ security resonates in many ways with the long and complex history of controlling the city’s heroin scene. Since the 1970s, Frankfurt am Main, as well as many other cities across Europe, have had to cope with the increasing presence of heroin users in the urban public space. The consumption of so-called “hard drugs” such as heroin as well as its spatial manifestations, the public gatherings of drug-consuming youth in plain sight for passersby, attracted strong media attention and caused a moral panic about the radical delinquency of teenage heroin users. The local authorities in Frankfurt considered heroin addicts as both threats to urban security and ill persons in need of medical and psychological care, therefore necessitating not only criminal persecution by the police, but also social service measures by the city administration. Consequently, the logics of governing the heroin scene oscillated between coer1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全的重新配置:在美因河畔法兰克福管理海洛因使用者,1975-1995
今天,美因河畔的法兰克福市被广泛认为是德国首批对海洛因使用者采取所谓“减少伤害”政策的主要城市之一。市政府不是压制或强迫吸毒者戒毒,而是主要侧重于通过一系列多方面的措施,如安全注射场所、美沙酮维持计划、法律咨询服务和援助住房项目,来降低吸毒风险和稳定吸毒者的健康。市政府称赞“法兰克福的毒品政治道路”是“国内外许多城市的榜样”,并强调其毒品政策具有双重效果,不仅改善了吸毒者的处境,而且有助于“保护公民”。将为海洛因使用者提供社会和医疗援助作为改善公民安全的措施,在许多方面与控制城市海洛因场景的漫长而复杂的历史产生了共鸣。自20世纪70年代以来,美因河畔法兰克福以及欧洲许多其他城市都不得不应对城市公共空间中越来越多的海洛因使用者。海洛因等所谓“硬毒品”的消费及其空间表现,即吸食毒品的青少年在路人面前的公开集会,引起了媒体的强烈关注,并引发了一场关于青少年海洛因使用者激进犯罪的道德恐慌。法兰克福地方当局认为海洛因成瘾者既是对城市安全的威胁,又是需要医疗和心理护理的病人,因此不仅需要警察进行刑事迫害,而且需要城市管理部门采取社会服务措施。因此,管理海洛因场景的逻辑在强迫和强迫之间摇摆不定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Power in Securitization: Towards a Relational Understanding The Legitimation of Council Rule Through Vedute of the City and Territory of Nürnberg from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century: Visualizing Insecurity within an Image of Secured Order Reconfigurations of Security: Governing Heroin Users in Frankfurt am Main, 1975–1995 Securitized State Building? The Camerounian Decolonization in Conflict Introduction: Situating Power in Dynamics of Securitization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1