Immediate effects of isometric versus isotonic exercise on pain sensitivity and motor performance of ankle plantiflexor muscles

Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, Patricia León Ramírez, Antonio José Rodríguez-Pastrana Trujillo, Enrique Cabrera Cabrera, Eleuterio A. Sánchez Romero, María Dolores Sosa Sosa Reina, J. L. Alonso Pérez, J. Villafañe, J. Fernández Carnero
{"title":"Immediate effects of isometric versus isotonic exercise on pain sensitivity and motor performance of ankle plantiflexor muscles","authors":"Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, Patricia León Ramírez, Antonio José Rodríguez-Pastrana Trujillo, Enrique Cabrera Cabrera, Eleuterio A. Sánchez Romero, María Dolores Sosa Sosa Reina, J. L. Alonso Pérez, J. Villafañe, J. Fernández Carnero","doi":"10.55860/pgma4758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to quantify the differences on pain sensitivity and motor performance ankle plantiflexor muscles after performing an isometric versus an isotonic exercise task. A parallel experimental trial was carried out at the European University of the Canary Islands. A total of 47 healthy volunteers were recruited and randomly assigned to a group receiving an isometric exercise (n = 23) and a group receiving an isotonic exercise (n = 24). Pain threshold to pressure was measured at four specific points of the triceps surae neurosensory territory in medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, Tendo Achilles osteotendinous unit and aponeurosis plantar insertion. Furthermore, the two-point discriminatory threshold of the osteotendinous junction of the Achilles tendon and maximum voluntary contraction for plantar flexion were assessed before and after the intervention. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences for any of the variables PPT-MG (U Mann Whitney = 25; [1.265-0.650], p = .527), PPT-LG (U Mann Whitney = 25; [1.325-0.945]; p = .527) y PPT-TA (U Mann Whitney = 25; [-1.465-0.405] p = .527), D2P (U Mann Whitney = 30.5, IC95% [-0.800-1.300], p = .630) and MVC-PF (U Mann Whitney = 26.5, IC95% [-8.400, 2.900], p = .386). Isometric exercise was the only one able to modify the PPT-AP before and after treatment in a statistically significant way. In contrast, isotonic exercise was the training that demonstrated clinically significant changes in 2PD and MVC-PF before and after treatment. No statistically significant changes were identified between both groups in any of the variables studied.","PeriodicalId":224249,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55860/pgma4758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify the differences on pain sensitivity and motor performance ankle plantiflexor muscles after performing an isometric versus an isotonic exercise task. A parallel experimental trial was carried out at the European University of the Canary Islands. A total of 47 healthy volunteers were recruited and randomly assigned to a group receiving an isometric exercise (n = 23) and a group receiving an isotonic exercise (n = 24). Pain threshold to pressure was measured at four specific points of the triceps surae neurosensory territory in medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, Tendo Achilles osteotendinous unit and aponeurosis plantar insertion. Furthermore, the two-point discriminatory threshold of the osteotendinous junction of the Achilles tendon and maximum voluntary contraction for plantar flexion were assessed before and after the intervention. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences for any of the variables PPT-MG (U Mann Whitney = 25; [1.265-0.650], p = .527), PPT-LG (U Mann Whitney = 25; [1.325-0.945]; p = .527) y PPT-TA (U Mann Whitney = 25; [-1.465-0.405] p = .527), D2P (U Mann Whitney = 30.5, IC95% [-0.800-1.300], p = .630) and MVC-PF (U Mann Whitney = 26.5, IC95% [-8.400, 2.900], p = .386). Isometric exercise was the only one able to modify the PPT-AP before and after treatment in a statistically significant way. In contrast, isotonic exercise was the training that demonstrated clinically significant changes in 2PD and MVC-PF before and after treatment. No statistically significant changes were identified between both groups in any of the variables studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等长和等张运动对踝关节跖屈肌疼痛敏感性和运动表现的直接影响
本研究旨在量化在进行等长和等张力运动任务后踝关节跖屈肌的疼痛敏感性和运动表现的差异。在加那利群岛的欧洲大学进行了一项平行的试验。总共招募了47名健康志愿者,并随机分配到一组接受等长运动(n = 23)和一组接受等长运动(n = 24)。在腓肠肌内侧、腓肠肌外侧、跟腱骨腱单位和足底腱膜止点的三头肌表面神经感觉区域的四个特定点测量压力痛阈。此外,在干预前后评估了跟腱骨腱连接处的两点区别阈值和足底屈曲的最大自愿收缩。PPT-MG各变量组间差异均无统计学意义(U Mann Whitney = 25;[1.265-0.650], p = .527), PPT-LG (U Mann Whitney = 25;(1.325 - -0.945);p = .527) y pt - ta (U Mann Whitney = 25;[-1.465 ~ 0.405] p = .527)、D2P (U Mann Whitney = 30.5, IC95% [-0.800 ~ 1.300], p = .630)和MVC-PF (U Mann Whitney = 26.5, IC95% [-8.400, 2.900], p = .386)等长运动是唯一能够在治疗前后改变PPT-AP的方式,具有统计学意义。相比之下,等渗运动是在治疗前后表现出2PD和MVC-PF临床显著变化的训练。在研究的任何变量中,两组之间没有发现统计学上显著的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FIFA World Cup 2022 and Bangladesh Comprehensive approach to physical skill in different age groups in sports games hurdling on home straight in the women 3000m steeplechase Analysing factors impacting Bangladesh men's T20 cricket performance sport tourism and regional economic development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1