ARV2V: Attack resistant vehicle to vehicle algorithm, performance in term of end-to-end delay and trust computation error in VANETs

M. Rehman, Sheeraz Ahmed, Sarmad Ullah Khan, S. Begum, A. Ishtiaq
{"title":"ARV2V: Attack resistant vehicle to vehicle algorithm, performance in term of end-to-end delay and trust computation error in VANETs","authors":"M. Rehman, Sheeraz Ahmed, Sarmad Ullah Khan, S. Begum, A. Ishtiaq","doi":"10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making cities smarter and well equipped in communication prospective VANETs plays significant role. These days VANETs are quickly maturing and emerging technique in the field of communication technology build upon on the IEEE 802.11p standard proposed for DSRC among vehicles and following IEEE 802.11a/b/g standard for RSUs and vehicle communication. VANETs make the existence of ITS possible in WAVE through dissemination of vital FSAMs among vehicles to avoid any misfortune. The FSAMs basically consist of information about traffic situation, malicious nodes penetration, loss of information etc. However, due to high mobility environment vehicles distance among nodes varies which can also affect the link and delay or loss of information may also take place. So, absolute protocols in VANETs for desire output and data delivery on perfect time is still a challenging job. In our research work we tried to design a routing scheme, which provides better performance than the existing schemes like Trust and Logistic Trust. We compare our design scheme ARV2V in term of performance metrics, which are EED and TCE with Trust and LT techniques. In VANETs system it is important to receive data on time with less delay and minimal error to handle disastrous circumstances wisely. In our research paper we analyzed EED and TCE in Trust, LT and in our scheme ARV2V. We observed from simulation results that our scheme is much efficient than Trust and LT. From the comparison analysis our scheme ARV2V in term of performance metric TCE is 11.6% and 7.3% more efficient than LT and Trust schemes respectively, while Trust scheme is 4.3% efficient than LT. From EED comparison we observed that ARV2V 57.6% more efficient than Trust and 5.2% than LT, also Trust schemes faced 52.4% more delay than LT.","PeriodicalId":381362,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Making cities smarter and well equipped in communication prospective VANETs plays significant role. These days VANETs are quickly maturing and emerging technique in the field of communication technology build upon on the IEEE 802.11p standard proposed for DSRC among vehicles and following IEEE 802.11a/b/g standard for RSUs and vehicle communication. VANETs make the existence of ITS possible in WAVE through dissemination of vital FSAMs among vehicles to avoid any misfortune. The FSAMs basically consist of information about traffic situation, malicious nodes penetration, loss of information etc. However, due to high mobility environment vehicles distance among nodes varies which can also affect the link and delay or loss of information may also take place. So, absolute protocols in VANETs for desire output and data delivery on perfect time is still a challenging job. In our research work we tried to design a routing scheme, which provides better performance than the existing schemes like Trust and Logistic Trust. We compare our design scheme ARV2V in term of performance metrics, which are EED and TCE with Trust and LT techniques. In VANETs system it is important to receive data on time with less delay and minimal error to handle disastrous circumstances wisely. In our research paper we analyzed EED and TCE in Trust, LT and in our scheme ARV2V. We observed from simulation results that our scheme is much efficient than Trust and LT. From the comparison analysis our scheme ARV2V in term of performance metric TCE is 11.6% and 7.3% more efficient than LT and Trust schemes respectively, while Trust scheme is 4.3% efficient than LT. From EED comparison we observed that ARV2V 57.6% more efficient than Trust and 5.2% than LT, also Trust schemes faced 52.4% more delay than LT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ARV2V:抗车对车攻击算法,在VANETs中端到端延迟和信任计算误差方面的性能
使城市更智能、更完善的通信前瞻性vanet发挥着重要作用。如今,vanet在通信技术领域正在迅速成熟和新兴技术,其基础是针对车辆之间的DSRC提出的IEEE 802.11p标准,以及针对rsu和车辆通信的IEEE 802.11a/b/g标准。通过在车辆之间传播重要的fsam, VANETs使ITS在WAVE中的存在成为可能,以避免任何不幸。fsam基本上包括交通状况、恶意节点渗透、信息丢失等信息。然而,由于高机动环境,车辆在节点之间的距离不同,这也会影响链路,也可能发生延迟或信息丢失。因此,在VANETs中实现期望输出和数据及时交付的绝对协议仍然是一项具有挑战性的工作。在我们的研究工作中,我们尝试设计一种路由方案,它比现有的Trust和Logistic Trust方案提供更好的性能。我们在性能指标方面比较了我们的设计方案ARV2V,即EED和TCE与Trust和LT技术。在VANETs系统中,及时接收数据,减少延迟和错误,以明智地处理灾难性情况是非常重要的。在我们的研究论文中,我们分析了信托,LT和我们的方案ARV2V中的EED和TCE。我们从仿真结果中观察到,我们的方案比Trust和LT效率高得多。从比较分析中,我们的方案ARV2V在性能指标TCE方面分别比LT和LT效率高11.6%和7.3%,而Trust方案比LT效率高4.3%。从EED比较中,我们观察到ARV2V比Trust效率高57.6%,比LT效率高5.2%,Trust方案比LT面临52.4%的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy optimized routing with directional antennas and tagging for multimedia sensor networks A study of big data for business growth in SMEs: Opportunities & challenges Electromagnetic bandgap wearable dipole antenna with low specific absorption rate Virtual team management challenges mitigation model (VTMCMM) FPGA and ARM processor based supercomputing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1