Teaming in technical courses

David Cordes, J. Parker, D. Nikles, A. Hopenwasser, C. Laurie, Joseph A. Izatt
{"title":"Teaming in technical courses","authors":"David Cordes, J. Parker, D. Nikles, A. Hopenwasser, C. Laurie, Joseph A. Izatt","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the University of Alabama participating in the Foundation Coalition, the 1994-1995 academic year saw a completely new curriculum being prototyped for a class of 36 volunteer students within the college. The curriculum in question provides an integrated 13-hour sequence of calculus, physics, chemistry and engineering design for the students. One of the central themes to this sequence is the concept of teams and teaming. Students work in teams of four students throughout this course sequence. These teams operate as a unit for all classes, mathematics recitations, physics and chemistry laboratories, and all engineering design projects. A number of strategies for how to proceed were identified. Concern was placed on ensuring that students gain both the ability to function effectively within a team environment and also demonstrate their own individual ability to perform the task in question. This paper examines the processes by which teaming is performed within the integrated freshman year of the Foundation Coalition. It looks at successes that have been realized and also point out techniques that should not be repeated. The authors summarize their opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of the process, as well as identifying the principal lessons learned for both future semesters of this curriculum and other individuals interested in incorporating teaming into their own courses. In addition, the authors comment on the similarities and differences between freshmen students and upper-level engineering students with respect to teams and teaming.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

As a result of the University of Alabama participating in the Foundation Coalition, the 1994-1995 academic year saw a completely new curriculum being prototyped for a class of 36 volunteer students within the college. The curriculum in question provides an integrated 13-hour sequence of calculus, physics, chemistry and engineering design for the students. One of the central themes to this sequence is the concept of teams and teaming. Students work in teams of four students throughout this course sequence. These teams operate as a unit for all classes, mathematics recitations, physics and chemistry laboratories, and all engineering design projects. A number of strategies for how to proceed were identified. Concern was placed on ensuring that students gain both the ability to function effectively within a team environment and also demonstrate their own individual ability to perform the task in question. This paper examines the processes by which teaming is performed within the integrated freshman year of the Foundation Coalition. It looks at successes that have been realized and also point out techniques that should not be repeated. The authors summarize their opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of the process, as well as identifying the principal lessons learned for both future semesters of this curriculum and other individuals interested in incorporating teaming into their own courses. In addition, the authors comment on the similarities and differences between freshmen students and upper-level engineering students with respect to teams and teaming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术课程的团队合作
由于阿拉巴马大学参与了基金会联盟,1994-1995学年为学院内36名志愿学生设计了一个全新的课程原型。所讨论的课程为学生提供了微积分、物理、化学和工程设计等13个小时的综合课程。这个序列的中心主题之一是团队和团队的概念。在整个课程序列中,学生以四人一组的方式工作。这些团队作为一个整体进行所有课程、数学背诵、物理和化学实验以及所有工程设计项目。确定了若干如何开展工作的战略。我们关注的是确保学生既能在团队环境中有效地发挥作用,又能展示他们自己执行任务的个人能力。本文考察了在基金会联盟的综合大一学年中进行团队合作的过程。它着眼于已经实现的成功,也指出了不应该重复的技巧。作者总结了他们对这个过程的优点和缺点的看法,并为本课程的未来学期和其他有兴趣将团队合作纳入自己课程的个人确定了主要的经验教训。此外,作者还评论了大一和高年级工科学生在团队和团队方面的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students Toward a pre-disciplinary introductory design sequence People, product and process: interactive multimedia case study in integrated design and manufacturing strategies Systems model for learning A faculty-driven quality initiative at the Colorado School of Mines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1