{"title":"Myths of EMC globalization","authors":"E. Gazal","doi":"10.1109/ICSMC2.2003.1428311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world where every product has to be tested against several standards for different regions, manufacturers face mass expenses to fulfill marketing requirements. As these requirements are based on standards and laws, one should ask himself: why doesn't anyone try to \"standardize all standards\"? Why should a single product face the same test several times using different methods defining different limits? We would like to emphasize the need for standards globalization - we believe that standardization bodies should try to ease standardization processes in order to achieve better marketing relations between nations, manufacturers and customers and in order to create a financially and technically healthier environment. Radio, telecommunications, home appliances, security devises, medical equipment, military equipment, automotive equipment etc. - they all use not only different standards but also different test methods as well as equipment with different specifications (e.g. ESD generator for commercial and military applications). Surely, all of them have different environmental conditions, but these conditions lead to mismatched testing methods as well as different standards to be used. Probably, nobody ever tried to avoid this","PeriodicalId":272545,"journal":{"name":"2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003. EMC '03.","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003. EMC '03.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC2.2003.1428311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world where every product has to be tested against several standards for different regions, manufacturers face mass expenses to fulfill marketing requirements. As these requirements are based on standards and laws, one should ask himself: why doesn't anyone try to "standardize all standards"? Why should a single product face the same test several times using different methods defining different limits? We would like to emphasize the need for standards globalization - we believe that standardization bodies should try to ease standardization processes in order to achieve better marketing relations between nations, manufacturers and customers and in order to create a financially and technically healthier environment. Radio, telecommunications, home appliances, security devises, medical equipment, military equipment, automotive equipment etc. - they all use not only different standards but also different test methods as well as equipment with different specifications (e.g. ESD generator for commercial and military applications). Surely, all of them have different environmental conditions, but these conditions lead to mismatched testing methods as well as different standards to be used. Probably, nobody ever tried to avoid this
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMC全球化的神话
在一个每个产品都必须根据不同地区的几种标准进行测试的世界里,制造商面临着满足营销要求的巨额费用。既然这些要求是建立在标准和法律的基础上的,那么我们应该问自己:为什么没有人试图“标准化所有的标准”?为什么单一产品要多次使用不同的方法进行相同的测试,确定不同的极限?我们要强调标准全球化的必要性——我们认为,标准化机构应努力简化标准化进程,以便在国家、制造商和顾客之间实现更好的销售关系,并创造一个财政和技术上更健康的环境。无线电、电信、家用电器、安全装置、医疗设备、军事设备、汽车设备等-它们不仅使用不同的标准,而且使用不同的测试方法以及不同规格的设备(例如用于商业和军事应用的ESD发生器)。当然,它们都有不同的环境条件,但这些条件导致测试方法不匹配,使用的标准也不同。也许,没有人试图避免这种情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lightning current and overvoltage withstand capacity test of low voltage systems facility wiring MST measurement technique for EMC calibrations and exposure hazard evaluation Modified Smith-chart representation as applied to microstrip antenna design for wireless LAN applications Time-domain treatment of multi-layer soil in transient analysis of aerial multi-conductor transmission lines Can portable electronic devices (PEDs) interfere with aircraft systems?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1