Social Network Analysis of Trade Secrets and Patents as Social Relations

D. Opderbeck
{"title":"Social Network Analysis of Trade Secrets and Patents as Social Relations","authors":"D. Opderbeck","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2214595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper employs the empirical tools of social network analysis to examine the “property as social relations” approach to intellectual property. Social network analysis seeks to describe and model society and culture based on the connections between agents in a network. A “property as social relations” perspective suggests that property rights emerge out of, and help construct, social relationships. But things become murky when this perspective is applied to basic intellectual property problems. One such problem is the relationship between trade secrets and patents. In trade secret law, the social aspects of information have long been recognized. This intuition is confirmed by social network analysis. In fact, a notion of “social rivalry” permeates trade secret law. In patent law, in contrast, information continues to be viewed almost exclusively as a non-rivalrous economic commodity. Social network analysis demonstrates that the “social” qualities of an innovation are largely stripped away when the innovation moves from the trade secret to the patent domain. It is unclear, however, whether a “property as social relations” approach to patents would achieve the sorts of results its advocates hope would obtain.","PeriodicalId":246118,"journal":{"name":"Seton Hall Law School","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seton Hall Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2214595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper employs the empirical tools of social network analysis to examine the “property as social relations” approach to intellectual property. Social network analysis seeks to describe and model society and culture based on the connections between agents in a network. A “property as social relations” perspective suggests that property rights emerge out of, and help construct, social relationships. But things become murky when this perspective is applied to basic intellectual property problems. One such problem is the relationship between trade secrets and patents. In trade secret law, the social aspects of information have long been recognized. This intuition is confirmed by social network analysis. In fact, a notion of “social rivalry” permeates trade secret law. In patent law, in contrast, information continues to be viewed almost exclusively as a non-rivalrous economic commodity. Social network analysis demonstrates that the “social” qualities of an innovation are largely stripped away when the innovation moves from the trade secret to the patent domain. It is unclear, however, whether a “property as social relations” approach to patents would achieve the sorts of results its advocates hope would obtain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业秘密与专利社会关系的社会网络分析
本文运用社会网络分析的实证工具,考察了“财产即社会关系”的知识产权研究方法。社会网络分析试图根据网络中主体之间的联系来描述和模拟社会和文化。“作为社会关系的财产”观点认为,产权产生于社会关系,并有助于社会关系的构建。但是,当这种观点应用于基本的知识产权问题时,事情就变得模糊不清了。其中一个问题是商业秘密和专利之间的关系。在商业秘密法中,信息的社会性早已得到认可。这种直觉得到了社会网络分析的证实。事实上,“社会竞争”的概念渗透在商业秘密法中。相反,在专利法中,信息仍然几乎完全被视为一种非竞争性的经济商品。社会网络分析表明,当创新从商业秘密转移到专利领域时,创新的“社会”品质在很大程度上被剥夺了。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,对专利采取“作为社会关系的财产”的方法是否会取得其倡导者希望获得的那种结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lehman's Derivative Portfolio Social Network Analysis of Trade Secrets and Patents as Social Relations Incentivizing the Ordinary User Addressing Gaps in the Dodd-Frank Act: Directors' Risk Management Oversight Obligations Does an Independent Board Improve Nonprofit Corporate Governance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1