MENTALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERNITY

N. V. Skotna
{"title":"MENTALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERNITY","authors":"N. V. Skotna","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-193-3/107-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The relevance of the chosen topic is attributed to the fact that in modern conditions, along with the tendency of integration, there is another one – disintegration, which is manifested in the country’s ethnic, confessional and civilization crisis. The last few decades were characterized by the two differently directed processes: the process of globalization and the process of particularization, that is, separation, individualization. Unfortunately, “the world history shows that civilizational identity is not able to prevent conflicts originating from national, tribal or community identities, and its unifying role, as well as national identity, has often been punctuated by the disintegrating influence of class, social, ethnic, clan, denominational and other identities, although their mobilization value is now significantly diminished” 1 . Today, the destruction of major social institutions related to the process of social and self-identification of the individual leads to the loss of meaning in life, disorientation and de-identification of the members of society. In such a situation, the citizens of any country continue to question the very basics of the ontological authenticity of anything in the world, subconsciously realizing that they lack deep and reliable relationships and values. Not only the surrounding world ceased to be transparent and familiar to a man, but also a man to himself. Therefore, it is important to understand the common and distinctive features of the Ukrainian society that lead to conflicts or their resolution. Undoubtedly, the category of “mentality” opens the way to understanding the various aspects of spiritual life, the secrets of individual and collective consciousness, the peculiarities of the national spirit of the people, their character, habits and primal interests. The very concept of mentality, according to the researchers, shows that collective emotions and typical reactions of ethnos affect social relations no less than rational motives. Indeed, the peculiarities of worldview and consciousness play a prominent role in the history of any nation, state. That is, we are talking about the","PeriodicalId":260827,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND VALUES OF THE MODERN CULTURE","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND VALUES OF THE MODERN CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-193-3/107-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The relevance of the chosen topic is attributed to the fact that in modern conditions, along with the tendency of integration, there is another one – disintegration, which is manifested in the country’s ethnic, confessional and civilization crisis. The last few decades were characterized by the two differently directed processes: the process of globalization and the process of particularization, that is, separation, individualization. Unfortunately, “the world history shows that civilizational identity is not able to prevent conflicts originating from national, tribal or community identities, and its unifying role, as well as national identity, has often been punctuated by the disintegrating influence of class, social, ethnic, clan, denominational and other identities, although their mobilization value is now significantly diminished” 1 . Today, the destruction of major social institutions related to the process of social and self-identification of the individual leads to the loss of meaning in life, disorientation and de-identification of the members of society. In such a situation, the citizens of any country continue to question the very basics of the ontological authenticity of anything in the world, subconsciously realizing that they lack deep and reliable relationships and values. Not only the surrounding world ceased to be transparent and familiar to a man, but also a man to himself. Therefore, it is important to understand the common and distinctive features of the Ukrainian society that lead to conflicts or their resolution. Undoubtedly, the category of “mentality” opens the way to understanding the various aspects of spiritual life, the secrets of individual and collective consciousness, the peculiarities of the national spirit of the people, their character, habits and primal interests. The very concept of mentality, according to the researchers, shows that collective emotions and typical reactions of ethnos affect social relations no less than rational motives. Indeed, the peculiarities of worldview and consciousness play a prominent role in the history of any nation, state. That is, we are talking about the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代性语境下的心态与身份问题
选题的相关性在于,在现代条件下,随着一体化的趋势,存在着另一种现象——解体,这种现象表现为国家的民族危机、信仰危机和文明危机。过去几十年的特点是两个方向不同的过程:全球化的过程和特殊化的过程,即分离,个性化。不幸的是,“世界历史表明,文明认同无法防止源自民族、部落或社区认同的冲突,它的统一作用以及民族认同常常被阶级、社会、种族、氏族、教派和其他认同的瓦解影响所打断,尽管它们的动员价值现在已大大削弱”1。今天,与个人的社会和自我认同过程有关的主要社会机构的破坏导致了生活意义的丧失、社会成员的迷失方向和去认同。在这种情况下,任何国家的公民都继续质疑世界上任何事物本体论真实性的基础,潜意识地意识到他们缺乏深厚而可靠的关系和价值观。不仅周围的世界对一个人来说不再是透明和熟悉的,而且这个人对自己也是如此。因此,重要的是要了解导致冲突或其解决的乌克兰社会的共同和独特特征。毫无疑问,“心态”的范畴为理解精神生活的各个方面、个人和集体意识的秘密、人民民族精神的特点、他们的性格、习惯和原始利益开辟了道路。根据研究人员的说法,心理这个概念表明,群体的集体情绪和典型反应对社会关系的影响不亚于理性动机。的确,世界观和意识的独特性在任何民族、国家的历史中都扮演着重要的角色。也就是说,我们讨论的是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AXIOLOGY OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION IN THE “WORLD OF ECONOMY” PARADIGM SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT OF MAN IN THE CONTEXT OF CHRISTIAN-ANTHROPOLOGICAL VIEWS IN PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT OF KIEVAN RUS TYPOLOGY OF METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO CONSIDERATION OF THINKING MYSTICAL SPACE OF NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHY HRYHORIY SKOVORODA’S PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION: THE DIFFERENCE OF THE MODERN VISION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HEART
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1