D Bossard, J D Grange, J C Froment, J P Gerard, D Lyonnet
{"title":"[Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary body].","authors":"D Bossard, J D Grange, J C Froment, J P Gerard, D Lyonnet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated 16 patients with malignant melanomas of the choroid (11) or the ciliary body (5) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using a 0.5 T magnet and a surface coil. The tumor was seen in all cases, hyperintense in T1-weighted images, and hypointense in T2-weighted sequences (80%). These images reflected the short T1 and T2 relaxation times caused by the presence of melanin in those tumors. This non-invasive method was superior to computed tomography (70%), and sometimes superior to fundoscopy (2 cases), angiofluorography (3 cases) or echography (1 case). MRI also proved valuable for differentiating uveal melanoma from associated subretinal effusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9346,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin des societes d'ophtalmologie de France","volume":"90 8-9","pages":"865-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin des societes d'ophtalmologie de France","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We evaluated 16 patients with malignant melanomas of the choroid (11) or the ciliary body (5) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using a 0.5 T magnet and a surface coil. The tumor was seen in all cases, hyperintense in T1-weighted images, and hypointense in T2-weighted sequences (80%). These images reflected the short T1 and T2 relaxation times caused by the presence of melanin in those tumors. This non-invasive method was superior to computed tomography (70%), and sometimes superior to fundoscopy (2 cases), angiofluorography (3 cases) or echography (1 case). MRI also proved valuable for differentiating uveal melanoma from associated subretinal effusion.