KAMU BÜTÇESİNDE YAPI-ARAÇ UYUŞMAZLIĞI: KURAMSAL ANALİZ

Ferhat Akbey
{"title":"KAMU BÜTÇESİNDE YAPI-ARAÇ UYUŞMAZLIĞI: KURAMSAL ANALİZ","authors":"Ferhat Akbey","doi":"10.11611/JMER345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout twentieth century, the budgetary theory has exhausted six budgeting systems including the Classical one. This means one budgeting system per about seventeen years in average, and there were three main causes of these rapid changes: First, the concept of “power of purse” has been evaluated rigidly against the “power of fiscal policy”, in contrast to transformations in economic conjuncture. Second, as a result of insistence on this rigid evaluation, and on classical liberal budgetary principles, there have arisen discrepancies between budgetary structures, means and goals. These discrepancies have been reflected by “one budget constraint”, and thus, budgeting systems have been changed along with economic priorities. Third, due to these discrepancies that hadn’t been handled structurally, “systemic lags” have emerged in terms of tardiness of budgeting systems in following economic conjuncture.","PeriodicalId":147096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Economics Research","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Economics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11611/JMER345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Throughout twentieth century, the budgetary theory has exhausted six budgeting systems including the Classical one. This means one budgeting system per about seventeen years in average, and there were three main causes of these rapid changes: First, the concept of “power of purse” has been evaluated rigidly against the “power of fiscal policy”, in contrast to transformations in economic conjuncture. Second, as a result of insistence on this rigid evaluation, and on classical liberal budgetary principles, there have arisen discrepancies between budgetary structures, means and goals. These discrepancies have been reflected by “one budget constraint”, and thus, budgeting systems have been changed along with economic priorities. Third, due to these discrepancies that hadn’t been handled structurally, “systemic lags” have emerged in terms of tardiness of budgeting systems in following economic conjuncture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共预算编制中的结构-手段不匹配:理论分析
在整个二十世纪,预算理论已经穷尽了包括古典预算系统在内的六种预算系统。这意味着平均每17年就有一个预算系统,造成这些快速变化的主要原因有三个:首先,与经济形势的转变相比,“钱包权力”的概念被严格地与“财政政策权力”相比较。第二,由于坚持这种严格的评价和古典自由主义预算原则,在预算结构、手段和目标之间出现了差异。这些差异反映在“一个预算限制”上,因此,预算制度随着经济优先事项而改变。第三,由于这些不一致没有得到结构性的处理,在随后的经济危机中,预算制度的迟滞性出现了“系统性滞后”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Türk Beyaz Eşya Sanayii'nin Rekabet Gücü TÜRKİYE BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ SİSTEMİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNÜN KRİTİK ANALİZİ ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MARKA KONUSUNDAKİ DÜŞÜNCELERİNİN İNCELENMESİ İŞLETMELERDE DOĞRUSAL PROGRAMLAMA VE ÜRETİM PLANLAMASINDA BİLGİSAYAR UYGULAMALARI TÜRKİYE’DE BİLGİ VE İLETİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ VE TOPLAM FAKTÖR VERİMLİLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ: TODA-YAMAMOTO NEDENSELLİK YAKLAŞIMI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1