Academics’ Perceptions of Constraints to Quality Assurance Implementation in Higher Education in Algeria

Belimane Wissam, Chahed Amina
{"title":"Academics’ Perceptions of Constraints to Quality Assurance Implementation in Higher Education in Algeria","authors":"Belimane Wissam, Chahed Amina","doi":"10.2478/jec-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research purpose. This paper aims to explore Algerian academics’ perceptions of constraints to quality assurance recently implemented in higher education. Design / Methodology / Approach. Data was collected through a survey. An online questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was distributed to the Algerian academics through a snowball sampling method. In total, 121 answers were collected and treated using descriptive statistics. Findings. The analysis reveals that academics perceived constraints in all dimensions examined in this study. The main constraints were: the low involvement of different stakeholders in quality assurance projects, the weakness of internal and external communication, the absence of evidence of compliance with the national standard, the lack of involvement of academics in the development of action plans and the lack of follow-up. These constraints seem to hinder the quality assurance implementation process at the Higher Education Institutions (of the sample). These results may represent a challenge for institutions. Originality / Value / Practical implications. The study is original in that it examines a recent subject that is little dealt with in Algeria. The main contribution of this research is an analytical discussion of perceptions of academics about quality barriers encountered in Higher Education Institutions, leading to a significant enrichment of the literature.","PeriodicalId":431224,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Culture","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Research purpose. This paper aims to explore Algerian academics’ perceptions of constraints to quality assurance recently implemented in higher education. Design / Methodology / Approach. Data was collected through a survey. An online questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was distributed to the Algerian academics through a snowball sampling method. In total, 121 answers were collected and treated using descriptive statistics. Findings. The analysis reveals that academics perceived constraints in all dimensions examined in this study. The main constraints were: the low involvement of different stakeholders in quality assurance projects, the weakness of internal and external communication, the absence of evidence of compliance with the national standard, the lack of involvement of academics in the development of action plans and the lack of follow-up. These constraints seem to hinder the quality assurance implementation process at the Higher Education Institutions (of the sample). These results may represent a challenge for institutions. Originality / Value / Practical implications. The study is original in that it examines a recent subject that is little dealt with in Algeria. The main contribution of this research is an analytical discussion of perceptions of academics about quality barriers encountered in Higher Education Institutions, leading to a significant enrichment of the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学者对阿尔及利亚高等教育质量保证实施限制的看法
研究目的。本文旨在探讨阿尔及利亚学者对最近在高等教育中实施的质量保证约束的看法。设计/方法论/方法。数据是通过调查收集的。通过滚雪球抽样法向阿尔及利亚学者分发了一份5分李克特量表的在线问卷。总共收集了121个答案,并使用描述性统计进行了处理。发现。分析表明,在本研究中,学者们在所有维度上都感受到约束。主要的制约因素是:不同利益相关者在质量保证项目中的参与度较低,内部和外部沟通薄弱,缺乏符合国家标准的证据,缺乏学术界参与行动计划的制定以及缺乏后续行动。这些制约因素似乎阻碍了高等教育机构(样本)的质量保证实施过程。这些结果可能对机构构成挑战。原创性/价值/实际意义。这项研究具有独创性,因为它研究了一个在阿尔及利亚很少涉及的近期主题。本研究的主要贡献是对学术界对高等教育机构遇到的质量障碍的看法进行了分析讨论,从而丰富了文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bankruptcy Prediction Model Development and its Implications on Financial Performance in Slovakia Investigation of CSR Activities Connected to Covid-19 in Czech and Slovak Businesses Is the Concept of Industry 4.0 Still Interesting for Scientists due to the Emergence of Industry 5.0? Bibliometric Analysis The Place as a Brand. Theory and Practise of the Place Branding The Impact of Influencer Marketing on the Decision-Making Process of Generation Z
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1