Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, South India

Latha Jp, S. Rajendran, G. Umamaheswari, Sumathi
{"title":"Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, South India","authors":"Latha Jp, S. Rajendran, G. Umamaheswari, Sumathi","doi":"10.4172/2161-0703.1000169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S. aureus causes superficial to deep seated infections in human beings. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus arueus (MRSA) evolved in the 1960s and since then has become a worldwide concern owing to increasing morbidity and mortality in health-care settings and even community. (MRSA) is a resistant variant of S. aureus which are resistant to beta-lactum antibiotics and other classes of antimicrobials. Early and accurate detection of MRSA and their antimicrobial susceptibility profile is therefore imperative for the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. A total of 300 isolates of S. aureus collected from January 2010 to December 2012 were included in the study. S. aureus was characterized based on morphological and biochemical characters. To receive a pure culture, the isolates were grown on mannitol salt agar with supplement 5% v/v egg yolk emulsion. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out on the strains by disc diffusion technique and the results interrupted according to Clinical laboratory standards International (CLSI) guidelines. A significant proportion of the S. aureus isolates were obtained from the exudates (226) specimens in all the three years followed by blood (48), urine (16) and respiratory (10). The average resistance seen in the 300 isolates tested was ampicillin (97.2%), cephelaxin (94%), cefotaxime (96.4%), cloxacillin (100%), erythromycin (82.6%), Gentamycin (76.3%), ciprofloxacin (54.4%), clindamycin (40.4%) and linezolid and vancomycin were susceptible for all the strains. In conclusion, the prevalence of MRSA in our health-care setting is 45% among the clinical isolates of S. aureus. Active screening and proper infection control procedures need to be adopted to control the MRSA infection.","PeriodicalId":269971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

S. aureus causes superficial to deep seated infections in human beings. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus arueus (MRSA) evolved in the 1960s and since then has become a worldwide concern owing to increasing morbidity and mortality in health-care settings and even community. (MRSA) is a resistant variant of S. aureus which are resistant to beta-lactum antibiotics and other classes of antimicrobials. Early and accurate detection of MRSA and their antimicrobial susceptibility profile is therefore imperative for the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. A total of 300 isolates of S. aureus collected from January 2010 to December 2012 were included in the study. S. aureus was characterized based on morphological and biochemical characters. To receive a pure culture, the isolates were grown on mannitol salt agar with supplement 5% v/v egg yolk emulsion. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out on the strains by disc diffusion technique and the results interrupted according to Clinical laboratory standards International (CLSI) guidelines. A significant proportion of the S. aureus isolates were obtained from the exudates (226) specimens in all the three years followed by blood (48), urine (16) and respiratory (10). The average resistance seen in the 300 isolates tested was ampicillin (97.2%), cephelaxin (94%), cefotaxime (96.4%), cloxacillin (100%), erythromycin (82.6%), Gentamycin (76.3%), ciprofloxacin (54.4%), clindamycin (40.4%) and linezolid and vancomycin were susceptible for all the strains. In conclusion, the prevalence of MRSA in our health-care setting is 45% among the clinical isolates of S. aureus. Active screening and proper infection control procedures need to be adopted to control the MRSA infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南印度三级护理教学医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的特征
金黄色葡萄球菌在人类中引起浅表到深层感染。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是在20世纪60年代发展起来的,自那时以来,由于卫生保健机构甚至社区的发病率和死亡率不断上升,它已成为全世界关注的问题。(MRSA)是金黄色葡萄球菌的一种耐药变种,它对-乳抗生素和其他种类的抗菌素具有耐药性。因此,早期准确检测MRSA及其抗菌药物敏感性对选择适当的抗菌治疗至关重要。2010年1月至2012年12月采集的300株金黄色葡萄球菌被纳入研究。根据形态学和生化特征对金黄色葡萄球菌进行鉴定。为了获得纯培养,分离菌在甘露醇盐琼脂上生长,并添加5% v/v的蛋黄乳。采用圆盘扩散法对菌株进行药敏试验,结果按国际临床实验室标准(CLSI)指南中断。在所有三年中,从渗出液(226)标本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌占很大比例,其次是血液(48),尿液(16)和呼吸道(10)。300株分离菌的平均耐药率为氨苄西林(97.2%)、头孢霉素(94%)、头孢噻肟(96.4%)、氯西林(100%)、红霉素(82.6%)、庆大霉素(76.3%)、环丙沙星(54.4%)、克林霉素(40.4%),所有菌株均对利奈唑胺和万古霉素敏感。总之,在我们的卫生保健机构中,金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株中MRSA的患病率为45%。需要采取积极筛查和适当的感染控制程序来控制MRSA感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occurrence of Multidrug Resistance Escherichia coli and Other Bacteria Species Associated with Urinary Tract Infection in Two Geopolitical Zones of Ondo State, Nigeria Identical Subsequences of Contiguous Amino Acids in Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin and in Human Proteins A Comparison of Two Enrichment Broth Medium for the Isolation and Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae from Vaginal Swabs Kodamaea ohmeri, An Emerging Yeast in Tunisia: First Identification in Three Case Reports and Literature Review Effectivity of Caspofungin on the Resistant Isolates of Candida albicans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1