The Determinants of Credit Risk Under Dual Banking System: Indonesian Experience Based on Bank Specific Variables

Muhammad Nur Faaiz F. Achsani, Salina Kassim
{"title":"The Determinants of Credit Risk Under Dual Banking System: Indonesian Experience Based on Bank Specific Variables","authors":"Muhammad Nur Faaiz F. Achsani, Salina Kassim","doi":"10.29244/jam.9.2.215-229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesian banking system, conventional banks are operating side by side with Islamic banking in a dual banking system. In terms of the credit risk determinants, Islamic banks should be affected by the different factors as conventional banks. However, the similarity of Islamic banks and the conventional bank in terms of contracts might lead to the opinion the same variables are affecting the performance of Islamic and conventional banks. The objective of the study is to examine and obtain an understanding on how the credit and financing in Indonesian dual banking system responses to changes in bank-specific variables. The main approach to fit the model used in this study is the dynamic panel data. Based on the result of the combined model, there are some independent variables that significantly affect credit risk. Profitability significantly affects credit risk with a negative relationship. While size significantly affects credit risk with a positive relationship. When it comes to the dummy variable, it can be said that the type of bank doesn’t play a significant role in determining the credit risk. In other word, there is no difference between Islamic bank and conventional banks in terms of credit risk. To analyze the crisis effect deeper, we compare the result of conventional banking model 2016-2020 and Islamic banking model 2016-2020. There is no independent variable that significantly affect the credit risk in the conventional banking model 2016-2020, three out of four independent variables affect credit risk significantly in the Islamic banking model 2016-2020. This is because conventional banks tend to play safe by avoiding the disbursement of credit and focusing on derivatives. However, this strategy is not suitable for Islamic banking as they are not allowed to do speculative activities. Islamic banking are still focusing on traditional banking activity.","PeriodicalId":158243,"journal":{"name":"AL-MUZARA'AH","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-MUZARA'AH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.9.2.215-229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Indonesian banking system, conventional banks are operating side by side with Islamic banking in a dual banking system. In terms of the credit risk determinants, Islamic banks should be affected by the different factors as conventional banks. However, the similarity of Islamic banks and the conventional bank in terms of contracts might lead to the opinion the same variables are affecting the performance of Islamic and conventional banks. The objective of the study is to examine and obtain an understanding on how the credit and financing in Indonesian dual banking system responses to changes in bank-specific variables. The main approach to fit the model used in this study is the dynamic panel data. Based on the result of the combined model, there are some independent variables that significantly affect credit risk. Profitability significantly affects credit risk with a negative relationship. While size significantly affects credit risk with a positive relationship. When it comes to the dummy variable, it can be said that the type of bank doesn’t play a significant role in determining the credit risk. In other word, there is no difference between Islamic bank and conventional banks in terms of credit risk. To analyze the crisis effect deeper, we compare the result of conventional banking model 2016-2020 and Islamic banking model 2016-2020. There is no independent variable that significantly affect the credit risk in the conventional banking model 2016-2020, three out of four independent variables affect credit risk significantly in the Islamic banking model 2016-2020. This is because conventional banks tend to play safe by avoiding the disbursement of credit and focusing on derivatives. However, this strategy is not suitable for Islamic banking as they are not allowed to do speculative activities. Islamic banking are still focusing on traditional banking activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二元银行制度下信用风险的决定因素:基于银行特定变量的印尼经验
在印尼的银行体系中,传统银行与伊斯兰银行在双重银行体系中并存。在信贷风险决定因素方面,伊斯兰银行应该受到与传统银行不同的因素的影响。然而,伊斯兰银行和传统银行在合同方面的相似性可能会导致相同的变量影响伊斯兰银行和传统银行的业绩。本研究的目的是研究和了解印度尼西亚双重银行系统的信贷和融资如何对银行特定变量的变化作出反应。拟合本研究模型的主要方法是动态面板数据。根据组合模型的结果,存在一些显著影响信用风险的自变量。盈利能力显著影响信用风险,并呈负相关关系。而规模对信用风险有显著的正相关影响。对于虚拟变量,可以说银行类型对信用风险的决定作用并不显著。换句话说,伊斯兰银行和传统银行在信用风险方面没有区别。为了更深入地分析危机的影响,我们比较了2016-2020年传统银行模型和2016-2020年伊斯兰银行模型的结果。传统银行2016-2020模型中不存在显著影响信用风险的自变量,而伊斯兰银行2016-2020模型中四个自变量中有三个显著影响信用风险。这是因为传统银行倾向于采取安全策略,避免发放信贷,专注于衍生品。然而,这种策略不适合伊斯兰银行,因为他们不允许进行投机活动。伊斯兰银行仍然专注于传统的银行业务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinan Pola Konsumsi Dharuriyyah, Hajiyyah dan Tahsiniyyah (Studi Kasus Pengguna Marketplace di Kota Malang) Sustainability Disclosures and Financial Performance of Islamic Banks in Indonesia Influential Factors in the Development of Halal Food Consumption Behavior: Gunadarma University Students Analisis Impostor Syndrome dalam Aspek Religiositas terhadap Waqf Behavior Mahasiswa IPB dengan Pendekatan Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve Contribution of Zubair Hasan to Islamic Economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1