Mark Twain's Social Criticism in The Innocents Abroad

R. F. Fleck
{"title":"Mark Twain's Social Criticism in The Innocents Abroad","authors":"R. F. Fleck","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1971.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticism for the past twenty or thirty years of The Innocents Abroad centers around two basic contentions: (a) Twain was essentially a nationalistic \"frontier equalitarian\" (to use the words of Franklin Walker), and skeptical critic of European and Near East social and cultural values, or (b) Twain was essentially appreciative of foreign social and cultural values and actually, as Gladys Bellamy states, \"injected criticism of American ways and American civilization into his running commentary on the foreign scene.\"' Rather than getting into the debate of whether Twain was provincially American or truly appreciative of foreign society, I would like to investigate Twain's concern for the international human conditions in The Innocents Abroad. It cannot be denied that any writer who travels abroad, no matter what his nationality is, tends to judge foreign nations by his own and eventually, if he is not narrow-minded, his own country by foreign countries. The intelligent result of this process of judgment yields an international social philosophy to which nations X, Y, and Z can be measured. However crude Mark Twain's attempts are at arriving at such a philosophy in The Innocents Abroad, traces of internationalism can be found from his Azores chapter through his Holy Lands chapters. If one reads the book in this light, he will see that not only is America his guiding social frame of reference but also France and Italy and Russia. The reader will also note that not only is Italy the object of this social criticism but also America, France, Russia, and the Near East. For Twain, the physical and mental well-being of the common man, the peasant, should be the utmost concern of Turkey, Russia, France, or America, and it was by this standard that he judged all nations. Considering his reading audience, one can easily perceive that such a standard must have been popular. Certainly Franklin Walker is correct in saying that Twain was a \"frontier equalitarian,\" but it is my contention that his trip in 1867 to Europe and the Holy Lands made him an international equalitarian judging his own nation as well as others as a result of his exposure to misery and poverty he never dreamed possible. Early in the book, Twain criticizes Catholicism because it has prevented material progress and has instilled indolence in the minds of the Portuguese peasants in the Azores: '\"he Good Catholic Portuguese crossed himself and prayed God to shield him from all blasphemous desire to know more than his","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1971.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Criticism for the past twenty or thirty years of The Innocents Abroad centers around two basic contentions: (a) Twain was essentially a nationalistic "frontier equalitarian" (to use the words of Franklin Walker), and skeptical critic of European and Near East social and cultural values, or (b) Twain was essentially appreciative of foreign social and cultural values and actually, as Gladys Bellamy states, "injected criticism of American ways and American civilization into his running commentary on the foreign scene."' Rather than getting into the debate of whether Twain was provincially American or truly appreciative of foreign society, I would like to investigate Twain's concern for the international human conditions in The Innocents Abroad. It cannot be denied that any writer who travels abroad, no matter what his nationality is, tends to judge foreign nations by his own and eventually, if he is not narrow-minded, his own country by foreign countries. The intelligent result of this process of judgment yields an international social philosophy to which nations X, Y, and Z can be measured. However crude Mark Twain's attempts are at arriving at such a philosophy in The Innocents Abroad, traces of internationalism can be found from his Azores chapter through his Holy Lands chapters. If one reads the book in this light, he will see that not only is America his guiding social frame of reference but also France and Italy and Russia. The reader will also note that not only is Italy the object of this social criticism but also America, France, Russia, and the Near East. For Twain, the physical and mental well-being of the common man, the peasant, should be the utmost concern of Turkey, Russia, France, or America, and it was by this standard that he judged all nations. Considering his reading audience, one can easily perceive that such a standard must have been popular. Certainly Franklin Walker is correct in saying that Twain was a "frontier equalitarian," but it is my contention that his trip in 1867 to Europe and the Holy Lands made him an international equalitarian judging his own nation as well as others as a result of his exposure to misery and poverty he never dreamed possible. Early in the book, Twain criticizes Catholicism because it has prevented material progress and has instilled indolence in the minds of the Portuguese peasants in the Azores: '"he Good Catholic Portuguese crossed himself and prayed God to shield him from all blasphemous desire to know more than his
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克·吐温在《无辜者在国外》中的社会批判
过去二三十年对《无辜者的海外》的批评主要围绕着两个基本论点:(a)吐温本质上是一个民族主义的“边疆平等主义者”(用富兰克林·沃克的话来说),对欧洲和近东的社会和文化价值观持怀疑态度;或者(b)吐温本质上欣赏外国的社会和文化价值观,实际上,正如格拉迪斯·贝拉米所说,“在他对外国局势的持续评论中注入了对美国方式和美国文明的批评。”我不想讨论马克·吐温究竟是一个狭隘的美国人,还是真正欣赏外国社会,而是想研究一下马克·吐温在《无辜的海外》中对国际人类状况的关注。不可否认,任何一个到国外旅行的作家,不管他是什么国籍的,都倾向于以他自己的民族来判断外国,最终,如果他不狭隘的话,他会以外国来判断他自己的国家。这一判断过程的明智结果产生了一种国际社会哲学,X、Y和Z国家可以用它来衡量。无论马克·吐温在《无辜者的海外》中如何粗糙地试图达到这样一种哲学,从他的亚速尔群岛章节到他的圣地章节,都可以找到国际主义的痕迹。如果一个人从这个角度来阅读这本书,他就会发现,不仅美国是他的指导社会参考框架,法国、意大利和俄罗斯也是他的指导社会参考框架。读者还会注意到,不仅意大利是这种社会批判的对象,美国、法国、俄罗斯和近东地区也是如此。对吐温来说,普通人、农民的身心健康应该是土耳其、俄国、法国或美国最关心的问题,他就是以此标准来评判所有国家的。考虑到他的读者,人们很容易感觉到这样的标准一定很受欢迎。富兰克林·沃克说吐温是一个“边疆平等主义者”,这当然是对的,但我的论点是,他1867年的欧洲和圣地之旅使他成为一个国际平等主义者,因为他经历了他做梦也想不到的苦难和贫困,所以他判断自己的国家和其他国家。在书的开头,吐温批评了天主教,因为它阻碍了物质进步,并在亚速尔群岛的葡萄牙农民的思想中灌输了懒惰:“这位虔诚的葡萄牙天主教徒在胸前划十字,祈求上帝保佑他不受一切亵渎神明的欲望的影响,不去了解更多的东西
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blindfolded and Backwards: Promethean and Bemushroomed Heroism in One Flew Over the Cuckoo'S Nest and Catch-22 Marino and Italian Baroque Chaucer's Psychologizing of Virgil's Dido Instant Publication Love, Identity, and Death: James' The Princess Casamassima Reconsidered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1