Post-Traumatic Stress after Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19): The Role of Gender and Distressing Social Media Exposure as Risk Factors

Adelais Reichmann, Ines Bauda, Bettina Pfeffer, A. Goreis, Mercedes M Bock, P. Plener, O. Kothgassner
{"title":"Post-Traumatic Stress after Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19): The Role of Gender and Distressing Social Media Exposure as Risk Factors","authors":"Adelais Reichmann, Ines Bauda, Bettina Pfeffer, A. Goreis, Mercedes M Bock, P. Plener, O. Kothgassner","doi":"10.24989/dp.v4i1.2183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct (e.g. being in contact with the virus) and indirect traumatic experiences (e.g. Distressing Social Media Exposure: DSME) of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a variety of psychological and psychosocial consequences. They represent COVID-19-related Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) risk factors, whereby their interactions and their relations to gender have not yet been explored. \n1368 participants filled in an online survey between the January and March 2021. Risk Ratios and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the magnitude of the risk related to a reported COVID-19 infection, reported COVID-19 symptom severity, gender and DSME on COVID-19-related PTSS. A 2x2x2 ANOVA was used to determine the main and interaction effects of a COVID-19 infection, gender and DSME on COVID-19 PTSS. \n174 (13%) participants reported COVID-19-related PTSS, which was more prominent in female (n=127; 15%), than in male participants (n=49; 9%). Individuals, who reported to have or have had a COVID-19 infection showed a significantly higher risk (RR=2.50, LCI=1.87, UCI=3.32) for COVID-19-related PTSS, especially when severe COVID-19 symptoms were reported (RR=4.01, LCI=2.66, UCI=6.03). Whereas non-infected females were at higher risk than males (p≤.001, LCI=16.96,UCI=23.81), a non-significant mean difference of 6.54 (p=.159, LCI=-14.62,UCI=1.54) between males and females was found when COVID-19 infections were reported. DSME increased the Risk Ratios by 2.81 (LCI=2.08, UCI=3.79) and was more prominent in males. \nThe results from this study indicate that severe COVID-19 symptoms, DSME and female gender are risk factors for COVID-19 related PTSS. This underlines the need for effective public health measures for prevention.  ","PeriodicalId":119095,"journal":{"name":"Digital Psychology","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24989/dp.v4i1.2183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct (e.g. being in contact with the virus) and indirect traumatic experiences (e.g. Distressing Social Media Exposure: DSME) of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a variety of psychological and psychosocial consequences. They represent COVID-19-related Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) risk factors, whereby their interactions and their relations to gender have not yet been explored. 1368 participants filled in an online survey between the January and March 2021. Risk Ratios and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the magnitude of the risk related to a reported COVID-19 infection, reported COVID-19 symptom severity, gender and DSME on COVID-19-related PTSS. A 2x2x2 ANOVA was used to determine the main and interaction effects of a COVID-19 infection, gender and DSME on COVID-19 PTSS. 174 (13%) participants reported COVID-19-related PTSS, which was more prominent in female (n=127; 15%), than in male participants (n=49; 9%). Individuals, who reported to have or have had a COVID-19 infection showed a significantly higher risk (RR=2.50, LCI=1.87, UCI=3.32) for COVID-19-related PTSS, especially when severe COVID-19 symptoms were reported (RR=4.01, LCI=2.66, UCI=6.03). Whereas non-infected females were at higher risk than males (p≤.001, LCI=16.96,UCI=23.81), a non-significant mean difference of 6.54 (p=.159, LCI=-14.62,UCI=1.54) between males and females was found when COVID-19 infections were reported. DSME increased the Risk Ratios by 2.81 (LCI=2.08, UCI=3.79) and was more prominent in males. The results from this study indicate that severe COVID-19 symptoms, DSME and female gender are risk factors for COVID-19 related PTSS. This underlines the need for effective public health measures for prevention.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后的创伤后应激:性别和痛苦的社交媒体暴露作为风险因素的作用
COVID-19大流行的直接(例如与病毒接触)和间接创伤经历(例如令人痛苦的社交媒体曝光:DSME)导致了各种心理和社会心理后果。它们代表了与covid -19相关的创伤后应激症状(PTSS)风险因素,因此它们的相互作用及其与性别的关系尚未得到探讨。在2021年1月至3月期间,1368名参与者填写了一项在线调查。计算风险比和95% ci,以估计与报告的COVID-19感染、报告的COVID-19症状严重程度、性别和COVID-19相关PTSS的DSME相关的风险程度。采用2x2x2方差分析确定COVID-19感染、性别和DSME对COVID-19 PTSS的主要影响和交互影响。174名(13%)参与者报告了与covid -19相关的ptsd,其中女性更为突出(n=127;15%),比男性参与者(n=49;9%)。报告感染或曾经感染COVID-19的个体患COVID-19相关PTSS的风险显著增加(RR=2.50, LCI=1.87, UCI=3.32),特别是当报告了严重的COVID-19症状时(RR=4.01, LCI=2.66, UCI=6.03)。而未感染的女性风险高于男性(p≤。0.001, LCI=16.96,UCI=23.81),平均差异为6.54 (p=。(159), LCI=-14.62,UCI=1.54)。DSME使风险比增加2.81 (LCI=2.08, UCI=3.79),且在男性中更为突出。本研究结果表明,严重的COVID-19症状、DSME和女性性别是COVID-19相关ptsd的危险因素。这突出表明需要采取有效的公共卫生预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Confounding in Educational Research: An Overview of Research Approaches Investigating Virtual and Augmented Reality Beyond Media Comparison: Investigating When and How Learning with Augmented and Virtual Reality Works Redefining Immersive Technology Research: Beyond Media Comparisons to Holistic Learning Approaches Expert Views On Artificial Intelligence Edited Pictures in Social Network and Borderline Personality Organization: Focusing on Shame, Guilt, Social Comparison, and Body Image
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1