{"title":"Structural Performance and Durability Issues of Vernacular Schist Masonry","authors":"C. E. Barroso, D. Oliveira, L. Ramos","doi":"10.23967/sahc.2021.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stone masonry is recognized as one of the most common vernacular construction techniques used around the world. Although centuries of proven resilience and high adaptability to context, structural stone masonry was in the last decades, in countries such as Portugal, progressively replaced in construction industry by industrial and concrete-based materials and building systems. Nowadays, with the loss of the old masons, an important part of traditional stone masonry constructive know-how is endangered. In face of growing concerns regarding heritage preservation, researchers are aware of the need to scientifically know such structures. Being less studied, vernacular schist rubble masonry was selected as case study and tested to determine mechanical behaviours and durability parameters. The potential of retrofitting such structures was also assessed [1]. 18 double-leave test wallets (60 cm x 60 cm x 30 cm), with soil used as bedding and joints mortar, were built following local building tradition [2], and prepared according to 3 different setups of 6 specimens each: i) non-coated; ii) with commercial lime coating; and iii) with commercial lime coating and injected with lime-based grout. The experimental campaign was designed and implemented in stages for a period of three years: i) stones and mortars experimental characterization; ii) axial compression testing of reference specimens (3 of each set); iii) specimens salt accelerated aging by full immersion wet-dry test (20% NaCl solution) [3]; iv) followed by compression testing. Damage progression was monitored throughout the salt testing by visual inspection, mass variation and sonic testing [4]. Results confirm rubble masonry’s low mechanical performance, high deformation capability to readjust and sustain loading. Grout retrofitting improved rubble walls’ stiffness and loading capacity on an average of 10 times. Results aged walls show a consistent loss of strength in non-coated (washing of mortars and chemical damage) and coated walls (high internal moister content). No consistent strength loss was observed in retrofitted walls, proven its potential in the protection rubble masonry against water and salt penetration, thus improving global durability.","PeriodicalId":176260,"journal":{"name":"12th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23967/sahc.2021.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stone masonry is recognized as one of the most common vernacular construction techniques used around the world. Although centuries of proven resilience and high adaptability to context, structural stone masonry was in the last decades, in countries such as Portugal, progressively replaced in construction industry by industrial and concrete-based materials and building systems. Nowadays, with the loss of the old masons, an important part of traditional stone masonry constructive know-how is endangered. In face of growing concerns regarding heritage preservation, researchers are aware of the need to scientifically know such structures. Being less studied, vernacular schist rubble masonry was selected as case study and tested to determine mechanical behaviours and durability parameters. The potential of retrofitting such structures was also assessed [1]. 18 double-leave test wallets (60 cm x 60 cm x 30 cm), with soil used as bedding and joints mortar, were built following local building tradition [2], and prepared according to 3 different setups of 6 specimens each: i) non-coated; ii) with commercial lime coating; and iii) with commercial lime coating and injected with lime-based grout. The experimental campaign was designed and implemented in stages for a period of three years: i) stones and mortars experimental characterization; ii) axial compression testing of reference specimens (3 of each set); iii) specimens salt accelerated aging by full immersion wet-dry test (20% NaCl solution) [3]; iv) followed by compression testing. Damage progression was monitored throughout the salt testing by visual inspection, mass variation and sonic testing [4]. Results confirm rubble masonry’s low mechanical performance, high deformation capability to readjust and sustain loading. Grout retrofitting improved rubble walls’ stiffness and loading capacity on an average of 10 times. Results aged walls show a consistent loss of strength in non-coated (washing of mortars and chemical damage) and coated walls (high internal moister content). No consistent strength loss was observed in retrofitted walls, proven its potential in the protection rubble masonry against water and salt penetration, thus improving global durability.
石砌体被认为是世界上最常用的本土建筑技术之一。尽管几个世纪以来,结构石砌体已被证明具有弹性和对环境的高度适应性,但在过去的几十年里,在葡萄牙等国家,结构石砌体在建筑业中逐渐被工业和混凝土材料和建筑系统所取代。如今,随着老泥瓦匠的流失,传统石砌筑技术的重要组成部分正濒临灭绝。面对日益增长的对遗产保护的关注,研究人员意识到需要科学地了解这些结构。研究较少,选择乡土片岩碎石砌体作为案例研究和测试,以确定力学行为和耐久性参数。对改造这种结构的潜力也进行了评估[1]。18个双叶测试钱包(60 cm x 60 cm x 30 cm),使用土壤作为垫层和接缝砂浆,按照当地建筑传统建造[2],并根据3种不同的设置(每种6个标本)进行准备:i)无涂层;Ii)用商品石灰涂布;iii)涂上商品石灰并注入石灰基浆液。实验活动是分阶段设计和实施的,为期三年:i)石头和迫击炮的实验表征;Ii)参考试样轴压试验(每组3个);iii)全浸干湿试验(20% NaCl溶液)加速老化试验[3];Iv)然后进行压缩试验。在整个盐试验过程中,通过目视检查、质量变化和声波测试来监测损伤进展[4]。结果表明,碎石砌体具有较低的力学性能和较高的变形能力,能够适应和承受荷载。灌浆改造使碎石墙的刚度和承载能力平均提高了10倍。结果:在未涂覆(砂浆清洗和化学损伤)和涂覆(内部含水量高)的墙体中,老化的墙体表现出一致的强度损失。在改造后的墙体中没有观察到持续的强度损失,证明了其在保护碎石砌体免受水和盐渗透方面的潜力,从而提高了整体耐久性。