Safer Type 1 Diabetes Care at Home: SEIPS-based Process Mapping with Parents and Clinicians

E. Kirkendall, Patrick W. Brady, Sarah D. Corathers, R. Ruddy, Catherine Fox, Hailee Nelson, Tosha B. Wetterneck, Isabelle M Rodgers, K. Walsh
{"title":"Safer Type 1 Diabetes Care at Home: SEIPS-based Process Mapping with Parents and Clinicians","authors":"E. Kirkendall, Patrick W. Brady, Sarah D. Corathers, R. Ruddy, Catherine Fox, Hailee Nelson, Tosha B. Wetterneck, Isabelle M Rodgers, K. Walsh","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The limited data indicate that pediatric medical errors in the outpatient setting, including at home, are common. This study is the first step of our Ambulatory Pediatric Patient Safety Learning Lab to address medication errors and treatment delays among children with T1D in the outpatient setting. We aimed to identify failures and potential solutions associated with medication errors and treatment delays among outpatient children with T1D. Methods: A transdisciplinary team of parents, safety researchers, and clinicians used Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) based process mapping of data we collected through in-home medication review, observation of administration, chart reviews, parent surveys, and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Results: Eight (57%) of the 14 children who had home visits experienced 18 errors (31 per 100 medications). Four errors in two children resulted in harm, and 13 had the potential for harm. Two injuries occurred when parents failed to treat severe hypoglycemia and lethargy, and two were due to repeated failures to administer insulin at home properly. In SEIPS-based process maps, high-risk errors occurred during communication between the clinic and home or in management at home. Two FMEAs identified interventions to better communicate with families and support home care, especially during evolving illness. Conclusion: Using SEIPS-based process maps informed by multimodal methods to identify medication errors and treatment delays, we found errors were common. Better support for managing acute illness at home and improved communication between the clinic and home are potentially high-yield interventions.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"133 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The limited data indicate that pediatric medical errors in the outpatient setting, including at home, are common. This study is the first step of our Ambulatory Pediatric Patient Safety Learning Lab to address medication errors and treatment delays among children with T1D in the outpatient setting. We aimed to identify failures and potential solutions associated with medication errors and treatment delays among outpatient children with T1D. Methods: A transdisciplinary team of parents, safety researchers, and clinicians used Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) based process mapping of data we collected through in-home medication review, observation of administration, chart reviews, parent surveys, and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Results: Eight (57%) of the 14 children who had home visits experienced 18 errors (31 per 100 medications). Four errors in two children resulted in harm, and 13 had the potential for harm. Two injuries occurred when parents failed to treat severe hypoglycemia and lethargy, and two were due to repeated failures to administer insulin at home properly. In SEIPS-based process maps, high-risk errors occurred during communication between the clinic and home or in management at home. Two FMEAs identified interventions to better communicate with families and support home care, especially during evolving illness. Conclusion: Using SEIPS-based process maps informed by multimodal methods to identify medication errors and treatment delays, we found errors were common. Better support for managing acute illness at home and improved communication between the clinic and home are potentially high-yield interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家更安全的1型糖尿病护理:父母和临床医生基于seips的过程映射
有限的数据表明,儿科医疗差错在门诊设置,包括在家里,是常见的。这项研究是我们的门诊儿科患者安全学习实验室的第一步,旨在解决门诊T1D儿童的用药错误和治疗延误问题。我们的目的是确定门诊T1D儿童用药错误和治疗延误相关的失败和潜在的解决方案。方法:一个由家长、安全研究人员和临床医生组成的跨学科团队使用基于SEIPS的患者安全系统工程计划(SEIPS)对我们通过家庭用药审查、给药观察、图表审查、家长调查和失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)收集的数据进行流程映射。结果:14名接受家访的儿童中有8名(57%)出现了18次错误(每100次用药中有31次)。两个孩子的4个错误导致了伤害,13个有潜在的伤害。两起伤害发生在父母未能治疗严重低血糖和嗜睡时,另外两起是由于在家中反复未能正确使用胰岛素造成的。在基于seips的流程图中,高风险错误发生在诊所和家庭之间的沟通或家庭管理中。两个fmea确定了更好地与家庭沟通和支持家庭护理的干预措施,特别是在疾病发展期间。结论:采用基于seips的多模式流程图来识别用药错误和治疗延误,我们发现错误是常见的。更好地支持在家中管理急性病和改善诊所与家庭之间的沟通是潜在的高收益干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1