{"title":"Mirror for Presidents","authors":"Daniel J. Hulsebosch","doi":"10.5744/florida/9780813066813.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is the president bound by law? If so, how? These are historical as well as modern questions, and they are questions that the first president, George Washington, asked himself and his advisors throughout his eight-year administration. As he and they marked the boundaries of the executive under the spare text of the new federal Constitution’s Article II, they used the law of nations to fill the gaps and define key powers. Enlightenment-era jurists like Emer de Vattel intended their treatises to function as updated versions of the traditional “mirror for princes,” or advice books for European rulers, and that is how the president and his cabinet read them. Just as throughout his life he had turned to self-help books to make his way in the world, Washington turned to Vattel to learn how to govern—not just how to govern other people, but more importantly how to govern with other people at home and abroad. The early modern law of nations not only provided stage directions, showing an actor how to behave among others. It also contained working scripts to borrow. Vattel in particular emphasized jealous territorial sovereignty and open commercial intercourse, and striking the balance between them was, in Washington’s eyes, the main task of his presidency.","PeriodicalId":315083,"journal":{"name":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813066813.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Is the president bound by law? If so, how? These are historical as well as modern questions, and they are questions that the first president, George Washington, asked himself and his advisors throughout his eight-year administration. As he and they marked the boundaries of the executive under the spare text of the new federal Constitution’s Article II, they used the law of nations to fill the gaps and define key powers. Enlightenment-era jurists like Emer de Vattel intended their treatises to function as updated versions of the traditional “mirror for princes,” or advice books for European rulers, and that is how the president and his cabinet read them. Just as throughout his life he had turned to self-help books to make his way in the world, Washington turned to Vattel to learn how to govern—not just how to govern other people, but more importantly how to govern with other people at home and abroad. The early modern law of nations not only provided stage directions, showing an actor how to behave among others. It also contained working scripts to borrow. Vattel in particular emphasized jealous territorial sovereignty and open commercial intercourse, and striking the balance between them was, in Washington’s eyes, the main task of his presidency.
总统受法律约束吗?如果有,怎么做?这些既是历史问题,也是现代问题,也是第一任总统乔治·华盛顿在其八年执政期间向自己和他的顾问提出的问题。当他和他们根据新联邦宪法第二条的空白文本划定行政部门的界限时,他们利用国际法来填补空白,界定关键权力。启蒙时代的法学家,如埃默·德·瓦泰尔(Emer de Vattel),打算将他们的论文作为传统的“王子之镜”或欧洲统治者的建议书的更新版本,而这正是总统及其内阁阅读它们的方式。正如他一生都在阅读自助书籍以在世界上找到出路一样,华盛顿也向瓦泰尔学习如何治理国家——不仅仅是如何治理他人,更重要的是如何与国内外的其他人一起治理国家。早期的现代国际法不仅提供舞台指导,告诉演员如何与他人交往。它还包含可以借用的工作脚本。瓦特尔特别强调领土主权和开放的商业往来,在华盛顿看来,在这两者之间取得平衡是他总统任期的主要任务。