Identifying The Superior Root Canal Irrigant Between Hydrogen Peroxide And Sodium Hypochlorite In Post Endodontic Pain Management

Jmmdc
{"title":"Identifying The Superior Root Canal Irrigant Between Hydrogen Peroxide And Sodium Hypochlorite In Post Endodontic Pain Management","authors":"Jmmdc","doi":"10.58380/jmmdc.v1i2.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Place of Study: THQ Thal Hospital LayyahStudy Design: Randomized control trialDuration of Study: January 2022 to July 2022Methodology: 104 subjects were selected by non-probability non purposive sampling technique. Informed consent was taken from the patients and they were randomly allocated to 2 study groups i.e. Group A (Sodium Hypochlorite) and Group B (Hydrogen Peroxide). Mechanical preparation of root canals for the lower first molar was done in the first appointment. In Group A, a 2.5 % Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigant was used, while in Group B, a 3% Hydrogen Peroxide (H O ) irrigant was used. 2 The patients were followed up after 10 days. The frequency of endodontic pain on the follow-up visit was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical Package for Social Science (version 23.0) (SPSS) was used to analyze the data. The frequency of endodontic pain was compared between the study arms with a chi-square test.Results: A total of 104 participants were placed into 2 groups, 52 cases in each group. 56/104 (54.30%) were males while 48/104 (45.70%) were females. In Group “A” endodontic pain on 10-day follow-up visit was present in 18/52 (34.6%) patients, while in Group “B” endodontic pain on 10-day follow-up visits were present in 35/52 (68%) patients. By using the chi-square test it was observed that there was a significant association between groups and the presence of endodontic pain having p-value = 0.001Conclusion: Sodium Hypochlorite was much better than Hydrogen Peroxide in the management of endodontic pain in terms of incidence.","PeriodicalId":286507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58380/jmmdc.v1i2.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Place of Study: THQ Thal Hospital LayyahStudy Design: Randomized control trialDuration of Study: January 2022 to July 2022Methodology: 104 subjects were selected by non-probability non purposive sampling technique. Informed consent was taken from the patients and they were randomly allocated to 2 study groups i.e. Group A (Sodium Hypochlorite) and Group B (Hydrogen Peroxide). Mechanical preparation of root canals for the lower first molar was done in the first appointment. In Group A, a 2.5 % Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigant was used, while in Group B, a 3% Hydrogen Peroxide (H O ) irrigant was used. 2 The patients were followed up after 10 days. The frequency of endodontic pain on the follow-up visit was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical Package for Social Science (version 23.0) (SPSS) was used to analyze the data. The frequency of endodontic pain was compared between the study arms with a chi-square test.Results: A total of 104 participants were placed into 2 groups, 52 cases in each group. 56/104 (54.30%) were males while 48/104 (45.70%) were females. In Group “A” endodontic pain on 10-day follow-up visit was present in 18/52 (34.6%) patients, while in Group “B” endodontic pain on 10-day follow-up visits were present in 35/52 (68%) patients. By using the chi-square test it was observed that there was a significant association between groups and the presence of endodontic pain having p-value = 0.001Conclusion: Sodium Hypochlorite was much better than Hydrogen Peroxide in the management of endodontic pain in terms of incidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鉴别双氧水和次氯酸钠在根管后疼痛治疗中的首选根管冲洗剂
研究地点:THQ Thal医院layyh研究设计:随机对照试验研究时间:2022年1月至2022年7月方法:采用非概率非目的抽样技术选取104名受试者。从患者中获取知情同意书,并将其随机分配到2个研究组,即A组(次氯酸钠)和B组(过氧化氢)。在第一次预约时完成下第一磨牙根管的机械预备。A组采用2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗液,B组采用3%过氧化氢(h2o)冲洗液。2术后10 d随访。采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)评价随访时牙根管疼痛发生频率。采用SPSS统计软件包(version 23.0)对数据进行分析。用卡方检验比较两组间牙髓疼痛的发生频率。结果:104例患者分为2组,每组52例。男性56/104例(54.30%),女性48/104例(45.70%)。A组随访10天出现牙髓疼痛的患者有18/52 (34.6%),B组随访10天出现牙髓疼痛的患者有35/52(68%)。通过卡方检验发现,两组间牙髓疼痛发生率存在显著相关性,p值= 0.001。结论:次氯酸钠治疗牙髓疼痛的发生率明显优于双氧水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Test article post Test THE NITTY-GRITTY OF WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE IN MEDICAL JOURNAL The Nitty-gritty Of Writing A Research Article In Medical Journal Assessment Of Shear Bond Strength And Failure Modes Between The Base And Bulk Resin Restorative Materials; An In Vitro Comparative Study Mobilization Of First Rib Impairment Caused By Bone Thronged In Larynx (A Case Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1