Instruments for diagnostic and treatment purposes from the la Tène period in Central Europe.

L. Buresova
{"title":"Instruments for diagnostic and treatment purposes from the la Tène period in Central Europe.","authors":"L. Buresova","doi":"10.14746/fpp.2022.27.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sources of knowledge of treatment practices in the La Tène period in Central Europe are limited. Archaeologists very often classify findings on the basis of their personal opinions which are not substantiated by evidence. The theories that have been proposed so far are not widely accepted by the academics. Artefacts that are expected to be used for diagnostics and treatment are not usually chosen to deduce the form and processes of therapeutic practice in the La Tène period. The main issue of the topic is the possibility to distinguish between tools for therapeutic procedures and artefacts created for other purposes. However, there is also the question of whether it is possible to distinguish between tools originating from Central Europe and tools originating in the Roman or Greek environment, artefacts which originated in the studied period from medieval or modern objects, and the real artefacts, for which there are no suitable analogies, from counterfeits created in the 18th‒19th centuries. For this purpose, specific debatable sets of artefacts are used. The goal of the research is to clarify the real purpose of the examined artefacts, for which it was previously proposed that they were used for therapy or diagnostics in the La Tène period. The results of the review and analysis of the artefacts have their explanatory ability about the state of practice in the studied geographical area.","PeriodicalId":330472,"journal":{"name":"Folia Praehistorica Posnaniensia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Praehistorica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/fpp.2022.27.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sources of knowledge of treatment practices in the La Tène period in Central Europe are limited. Archaeologists very often classify findings on the basis of their personal opinions which are not substantiated by evidence. The theories that have been proposed so far are not widely accepted by the academics. Artefacts that are expected to be used for diagnostics and treatment are not usually chosen to deduce the form and processes of therapeutic practice in the La Tène period. The main issue of the topic is the possibility to distinguish between tools for therapeutic procedures and artefacts created for other purposes. However, there is also the question of whether it is possible to distinguish between tools originating from Central Europe and tools originating in the Roman or Greek environment, artefacts which originated in the studied period from medieval or modern objects, and the real artefacts, for which there are no suitable analogies, from counterfeits created in the 18th‒19th centuries. For this purpose, specific debatable sets of artefacts are used. The goal of the research is to clarify the real purpose of the examined artefacts, for which it was previously proposed that they were used for therapy or diagnostics in the La Tène period. The results of the review and analysis of the artefacts have their explanatory ability about the state of practice in the studied geographical area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧la t时期用于诊断和治疗的仪器。
中欧关于La t时期治疗实践的知识来源有限。考古学家经常根据他们个人的观点对发现进行分类,而这些观点没有证据支持。到目前为止提出的理论还没有被学术界广泛接受。通常不选择用于诊断和治疗的人工制品来推断La t时期治疗实践的形式和过程。该主题的主要问题是区分用于治疗程序的工具和用于其他目的的人工制品的可能性。然而,还有一个问题是,是否有可能区分源自中欧的工具和源自罗马或希腊环境的工具,在研究期间源自中世纪或现代物品的人工制品,以及真实的人工制品,没有合适的类比,来自18 - 19世纪创造的赝品。为此目的,使用了特定的有争议的工件集。这项研究的目的是澄清这些被检查的文物的真正目的,因为之前有人提出它们在La t时期被用于治疗或诊断。对文物的审查和分析结果对所研究地理区域的实践状况具有一定的解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wykorzystanie żelaza w starożytnym Egipcie do początku okresu późnego Panowie i niewolnicy – gospodarka okresu halsztackiego Ceramika malowana z wczesnej epoki żelaza vs. nowożytna ceramika biała. Rozważania o magii i o „odczarowaniu świata” Problem sztuki naskalnej w Polsce Use-wear analysis of copper-alloy artifacts. A window of opportunity or a dead end?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1