2. Soviet Film: The Giant Laboratory of Technological Innervation

D. Mourenza
{"title":"2. Soviet Film: The Giant Laboratory of Technological Innervation","authors":"D. Mourenza","doi":"10.1515/9789048529353-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the two articles on Soviet film that Walter Benjamin wrote after his stay in Moscow: ‘On the Present Situation of Russian Film’ (1927) and ‘Reply to Oscar A. H. Schmitz’ (1927). These early texts on film are discussed in connection with ‘The Author as Producer’ (1934) and ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility’ (1935–1939), for they anticipate the debate about film and the politicization of art discussed in the latter texts. This chapter also discusses Benjamin’s insights about the use and conception of technology in the Soviet Union, the different political groupings in the Soviet art scene, and his position in these debates.","PeriodicalId":248788,"journal":{"name":"Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Film","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048529353-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyses the two articles on Soviet film that Walter Benjamin wrote after his stay in Moscow: ‘On the Present Situation of Russian Film’ (1927) and ‘Reply to Oscar A. H. Schmitz’ (1927). These early texts on film are discussed in connection with ‘The Author as Producer’ (1934) and ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility’ (1935–1939), for they anticipate the debate about film and the politicization of art discussed in the latter texts. This chapter also discusses Benjamin’s insights about the use and conception of technology in the Soviet Union, the different political groupings in the Soviet art scene, and his position in these debates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2. 苏联电影:技术创新的巨大实验室
本章分析了瓦尔特·本雅明在莫斯科逗留后写的两篇关于苏联电影的文章:《论俄罗斯电影的现状》(1927)和《对奥斯卡·a·h·施密茨的答复》(1927)。这些关于电影的早期文本是与《作为制片人的作者》(1934)和《技术可复制时代的艺术作品》(1935-1939)联系在一起讨论的,因为它们预示了关于电影和艺术政治化的辩论在后面的文本中讨论。本章还讨论了本雅明对苏联技术使用和概念的见解,苏联艺术界的不同政治团体,以及他在这些辩论中的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Index 3. Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism 5. Mickey Mouse: Utopian and Barbarian 1. Anthropological Materialism and the Aesthetics of Film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1