Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults

Madeline E. Shivgulam, M. O'Brien, Jarrett A. Johns, Jennifer L. Petterson, Yanlin Wu, Ryan J. Frayne, D. Kimmerly
{"title":"Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults","authors":"Madeline E. Shivgulam, M. O'Brien, Jarrett A. Johns, Jennifer L. Petterson, Yanlin Wu, Ryan J. Frayne, D. Kimmerly","doi":"10.1177/1358863X211065494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute, laboratory-based bouts of prolonged sitting attenuate lower-limb arterial endothelial-dependent vasodilation. However, the impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial health is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that greater habitual total sedentary time, more time spent in prolonged sedentary bouts, and fewer sedentary breaks would be associated with worse popliteal flow-mediated dilation (FMD) responses. Methods: This cross-sectional study used 98 healthy participants (19–77 years, 53 females) that wore an activPAL monitor on the thigh for 6.4 ± 0.8 days to objectively measure sedentary activity and completed a popliteal ultrasound assessment to determine FMD. Both relative (%baseline diameter) and absolute (mm) FMD were calculated. Using bivariate correlation and multiple regression analyses, we examined if there were relationships between sedentary outcomes and FMD while statistically controlling for any potential confounders. Results: In the multiple regression model, age (p = 0.006, β = −0.030, 95% CI = −0.051, −0.009) and total time in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (p = 0.031, β = −0.005, 95% CI = −0.009, −0.001) were independent predictors of relative FMD. Age (β = −0.002, 95% CI = −0.003, −0.001), mean blood flow (β = 0.013, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.024), moderate-intensity physical activity (β = 155.9E−5, 95% CI = 22.4E−5, 289.4E−5), sedentary breaks (β = 0.036, 95% CI = 0.007, 0.066), and total time spent in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (β = −25.02E−5, 95% CI = −47.67E−5, −2.378E−5) were predictors of absolute FMD (all, p < 0.047). All independent outcomes remained significant after partially controlling for all other predictor variables (all, p < 0.031). Conclusions: Habitual prolonged sedentary bouts and sedentary breaks, but not total sedentary time, were predictors of popliteal endothelial-dependent vasodilatory function. The patterns by which sedentary time is accumulated may be more important than the total sedentary time on lower-limb arterial health.","PeriodicalId":151049,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X211065494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Acute, laboratory-based bouts of prolonged sitting attenuate lower-limb arterial endothelial-dependent vasodilation. However, the impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial health is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that greater habitual total sedentary time, more time spent in prolonged sedentary bouts, and fewer sedentary breaks would be associated with worse popliteal flow-mediated dilation (FMD) responses. Methods: This cross-sectional study used 98 healthy participants (19–77 years, 53 females) that wore an activPAL monitor on the thigh for 6.4 ± 0.8 days to objectively measure sedentary activity and completed a popliteal ultrasound assessment to determine FMD. Both relative (%baseline diameter) and absolute (mm) FMD were calculated. Using bivariate correlation and multiple regression analyses, we examined if there were relationships between sedentary outcomes and FMD while statistically controlling for any potential confounders. Results: In the multiple regression model, age (p = 0.006, β = −0.030, 95% CI = −0.051, −0.009) and total time in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (p = 0.031, β = −0.005, 95% CI = −0.009, −0.001) were independent predictors of relative FMD. Age (β = −0.002, 95% CI = −0.003, −0.001), mean blood flow (β = 0.013, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.024), moderate-intensity physical activity (β = 155.9E−5, 95% CI = 22.4E−5, 289.4E−5), sedentary breaks (β = 0.036, 95% CI = 0.007, 0.066), and total time spent in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (β = −25.02E−5, 95% CI = −47.67E−5, −2.378E−5) were predictors of absolute FMD (all, p < 0.047). All independent outcomes remained significant after partially controlling for all other predictor variables (all, p < 0.031). Conclusions: Habitual prolonged sedentary bouts and sedentary breaks, but not total sedentary time, were predictors of popliteal endothelial-dependent vasodilatory function. The patterns by which sedentary time is accumulated may be more important than the total sedentary time on lower-limb arterial health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
习惯久坐模式对健康成人腘动脉内皮依赖性血管舒张的影响
急性,实验室为基础的长时间静坐会减弱下肢动脉内皮依赖性血管舒张。然而,习惯性久坐模式对腘动脉内皮健康的影响尚不清楚。我们检验了这样的假设:更长的习惯性总久坐时间、更长的久坐时间和更少的久坐休息时间与更差的腘窝血流介导的舒张(FMD)反应相关。方法:本横断面研究采用98名健康参与者(19-77岁,53名女性),在大腿上佩戴活动pal监测仪6.4±0.8天,客观测量久坐活动,并完成腘动脉超声评估以确定FMD。计算相对(%基线直径)和绝对(mm) FMD。使用双变量相关和多元回归分析,我们在统计控制任何潜在混杂因素的同时,检查了久坐结果与口蹄疫之间是否存在关系。结果:在多元回归模型中,年龄(p = 0.006, β = - 0.030, 95% CI = - 0.051, - 0.009)和总久坐时间> 1小时(p = 0.031, β = - 0.005, 95% CI = - 0.009, - 0.001)是相对FMD的独立预测因子。年龄(β = - 0.002, 95% CI = - 0.003, - 0.001)、平均血流量(β = 0.013, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.024)、中等强度体力活动(β = 155.9E−5,95% CI = 22.4E−5,288.4 e−5)、久坐休息(β = 0.036, 95% CI = 0.007, 0.066)、久坐时间> 1小时(β = - 25.02E−5,95% CI = - 47.67E−5,- 2.378E−5)是绝对FMD的预测因子(均p < 0.047)。在部分控制所有其他预测变量后,所有独立结果仍然显著(均p < 0.031)。结论:习惯性长时间久坐和久坐休息,而不是总久坐时间,是腘动脉内皮依赖性血管舒张功能的预测因素。久坐时间的累积模式可能比总久坐时间对下肢动脉健康更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the burden of disease for patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularization in England SCAI/ACR/APMA/SCVS/SIR/SVM/SVS/VESS Position Statement on Competencies for Endovascular Specialists Providing CLTI Care Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults Risk factors for major bleeding in the SEATTLE II trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1