New Deconstruct Elliptical sports machine and Elliptical machine

Carlos Elvira, Mario Terol-Sanchis, M. J. Gomis-Gomis, C. Suárez-Llorca
{"title":"New Deconstruct Elliptical sports machine and Elliptical machine","authors":"Carlos Elvira, Mario Terol-Sanchis, M. J. Gomis-Gomis, C. Suárez-Llorca","doi":"10.55860/zwdl2353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article was to compare different cardiovascular training machines and their effects on the body, as well as to determine their suitability for people with low intensity or high intensity training needs. A total of 8 physically active and healthy male subjects (mean ± standard deviation; age: 28.45 ± 1.75 years; height: 1.84 ± 0.07 m; body weight 76.42 ± 8.62 kg; body mass index: 25.5 ± 2.6) were evaluated through of an incremental exercise test at different intensities on two different machines: Elliptical Domyos 680 (BED) and Deconstruct Elliptical 331-EF (DEC). To compare both machines against the two mentioned training needs, two different protocols were carried out: Low Intensity Protocol  (LIP) and High Intensity Protocol (HIP). In addition, a thermographic analysis was carried out in order to determine the temperature differences reached in the musculature. No significant differences were found in HR and EE (p < .05) between the two machines. However, a greater and more progressive activation of the muscles of the upper extremities was observed in the DEC machine. In the HIP, HR and EE were measured, obtaining significant differences (p < .05) higher in the DEC machine. Therefore, in our comparison, the Deconstruct Elliptical machine produced more appropriate results for both low and high intensity training compared to the Elliptical machine. These results and the novel nature of the Deconstruct Elliptical raise the need for further studies to better understand this machine.","PeriodicalId":224249,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55860/zwdl2353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this article was to compare different cardiovascular training machines and their effects on the body, as well as to determine their suitability for people with low intensity or high intensity training needs. A total of 8 physically active and healthy male subjects (mean ± standard deviation; age: 28.45 ± 1.75 years; height: 1.84 ± 0.07 m; body weight 76.42 ± 8.62 kg; body mass index: 25.5 ± 2.6) were evaluated through of an incremental exercise test at different intensities on two different machines: Elliptical Domyos 680 (BED) and Deconstruct Elliptical 331-EF (DEC). To compare both machines against the two mentioned training needs, two different protocols were carried out: Low Intensity Protocol  (LIP) and High Intensity Protocol (HIP). In addition, a thermographic analysis was carried out in order to determine the temperature differences reached in the musculature. No significant differences were found in HR and EE (p < .05) between the two machines. However, a greater and more progressive activation of the muscles of the upper extremities was observed in the DEC machine. In the HIP, HR and EE were measured, obtaining significant differences (p < .05) higher in the DEC machine. Therefore, in our comparison, the Deconstruct Elliptical machine produced more appropriate results for both low and high intensity training compared to the Elliptical machine. These results and the novel nature of the Deconstruct Elliptical raise the need for further studies to better understand this machine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新解构椭圆运动机和椭圆机
本文的目的是比较不同的心血管训练机及其对身体的影响,以及确定它们适合低强度或高强度训练需求的人。共8名体力活动健康男性受试者(均数±标准差;年龄:28.45±1.75岁;高度:1.84±0.07 m;体重76.42±8.62 kg;体重指数:25.5±2.6),通过在两台不同的机器上进行不同强度的增量运动测试:椭圆Domyos 680 (BED)和解构椭圆331-EF (DEC)。为了将两台机器与上述两种训练需求进行比较,采用了两种不同的方案:低强度方案(LIP)和高强度方案(HIP)。此外,还进行了热成像分析,以确定肌肉组织中达到的温差。两机间HR、EE差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,在DEC机器中观察到上肢肌肉更大、更渐进的激活。在HIP、HR和EE的测量中,在DEC机器中获得显著差异(p < 0.05)。因此,在我们的比较中,与椭圆机相比,解构椭圆机在低强度和高强度训练中都产生了更合适的结果。这些结果和解构椭圆机的新颖性提出了进一步研究以更好地理解这台机器的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FIFA World Cup 2022 and Bangladesh Comprehensive approach to physical skill in different age groups in sports games hurdling on home straight in the women 3000m steeplechase Analysing factors impacting Bangladesh men's T20 cricket performance sport tourism and regional economic development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1