A Critical Analysis of Legal Implications for the Executive Remuneration

V. Kruglyak
{"title":"A Critical Analysis of Legal Implications for the Executive Remuneration","authors":"V. Kruglyak","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3692113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the legal precedents that allow the disproportional increase in the executive pay at the UK and the US based corporations. At its core, the argument explores incompatibility of the regulatory instruments with the corporate practices used to issue the excessive compensation packages for the Chief Executive Officers and their teams. Starting from the analysis of the authority and information asymmetry, the focus of research narrows on the current regulatory instruments and outcomes they produce. The goal is to discover how CEOs can achieve the higher compensation while violating no existing Government guidelines on the executive pay and regulations of the corporate governance. The existence of legal consequences under study as to the impact that the executive pay creates on the rights of shareholders. Consequently, the question is explored as to what extent the decrease of dividends and retained earnings were affected as a result of a CEO’s pay. By analysing existing regulatory instruments and by showing how they are circumvented, this research considers what changes may be necessary to the executive compensation policies, protection of dividends, and guarantee of voting rights for all shareholders and stakeholders in a publicly traded corporation.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3692113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the legal precedents that allow the disproportional increase in the executive pay at the UK and the US based corporations. At its core, the argument explores incompatibility of the regulatory instruments with the corporate practices used to issue the excessive compensation packages for the Chief Executive Officers and their teams. Starting from the analysis of the authority and information asymmetry, the focus of research narrows on the current regulatory instruments and outcomes they produce. The goal is to discover how CEOs can achieve the higher compensation while violating no existing Government guidelines on the executive pay and regulations of the corporate governance. The existence of legal consequences under study as to the impact that the executive pay creates on the rights of shareholders. Consequently, the question is explored as to what extent the decrease of dividends and retained earnings were affected as a result of a CEO’s pay. By analysing existing regulatory instruments and by showing how they are circumvented, this research considers what changes may be necessary to the executive compensation policies, protection of dividends, and guarantee of voting rights for all shareholders and stakeholders in a publicly traded corporation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政人员薪酬之法律影响之批判性分析
本研究考察了允许英国和美国公司高管薪酬不成比例增长的法律先例。该论点的核心是探讨监管文书与用于向首席执行官及其团队发放过多薪酬的公司做法之间的不兼容性。从权威和信息不对称的分析出发,研究的焦点缩小到现有的监管工具及其产生的结果。目的是发现ceo如何在不违反现行政府关于高管薪酬的指导方针和公司治理规定的情况下获得更高的薪酬。关于高管薪酬对股东权利的影响是否存在法律后果正在研究中。因此,本文探讨了CEO薪酬对股息和留存收益减少的影响程度。通过分析现有的监管工具,并通过展示它们是如何被规避的,本研究考虑了哪些变化可能是必要的高管薪酬政策,保护股息,并保证所有股东和上市公司的利益相关者的投票权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pith and Marrow is Dead… Long Live Pith and Marrow: The Doctrine of Equivalents After Actavis THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling The Internal Market: An Historical Perspective AI in the Boardroom: Let the Law be in the Driving Seat Back to School - and After
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1