Comparative Study of Drilling Riser Running/Retrieving Analysis Methodologies

Leandro Vale, C. Gallagher, M. Souza, D. Carneiro
{"title":"Comparative Study of Drilling Riser Running/Retrieving Analysis Methodologies","authors":"Leandro Vale, C. Gallagher, M. Souza, D. Carneiro","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-62534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drilling risers are key components in offshore oil exploration and are present in most of the well construction phases (drilling, casing, cementing and completion). Mobile offshore drilling units can operate in different sites exposed to a range of environmental loadings and water depths. Global riser analyses based on the FE (finite element) method are performed to assess the system feasibility and operating envelopes. In harsh environment and ultradeep water scenarios, the riser running/retrieving operation is one of the most critical due to top-angle limits and riser stress as a result of either contact with the inside of the diverter housing/substructures or loading at the gimbal-spider (API-RP-16Q [1], ISO 13624-1 [2]).\n The use of beam-column elements is satisfactory for modelling the riser global response, however it may lead to result uncertainty in terms of local response associated with complex geometry, over-stress, stress concentration and contact modelling (DNV-ST-F201 [3], DNVGL-RP-F203 [4], ISO 13628-7 [5]). The objective of this paper is to compare riser analysis results from a global and a local FE analysis. This comparison is used to identify any limitations associated with the use of a global riser analysis approach for determining structural limits for the riser during deployment/retrieving operations. Several recommendations are also provided regarding the use of the global analysis approach.","PeriodicalId":240325,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-62534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drilling risers are key components in offshore oil exploration and are present in most of the well construction phases (drilling, casing, cementing and completion). Mobile offshore drilling units can operate in different sites exposed to a range of environmental loadings and water depths. Global riser analyses based on the FE (finite element) method are performed to assess the system feasibility and operating envelopes. In harsh environment and ultradeep water scenarios, the riser running/retrieving operation is one of the most critical due to top-angle limits and riser stress as a result of either contact with the inside of the diverter housing/substructures or loading at the gimbal-spider (API-RP-16Q [1], ISO 13624-1 [2]). The use of beam-column elements is satisfactory for modelling the riser global response, however it may lead to result uncertainty in terms of local response associated with complex geometry, over-stress, stress concentration and contact modelling (DNV-ST-F201 [3], DNVGL-RP-F203 [4], ISO 13628-7 [5]). The objective of this paper is to compare riser analysis results from a global and a local FE analysis. This comparison is used to identify any limitations associated with the use of a global riser analysis approach for determining structural limits for the riser during deployment/retrieving operations. Several recommendations are also provided regarding the use of the global analysis approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钻井隔水管下入/回收分析方法对比研究
钻井隔水管是海上石油勘探的关键部件,存在于钻井、套管、固井和完井的大部分施工阶段。移动式海上钻井设备可以在不同的环境载荷和水深下作业。采用有限元法对整体立管进行了分析,以评估系统的可行性和运行包络度。在恶劣的环境和超深水环境中,由于顶角限制和立管应力,隔水管下入/回收作业是最关键的作业之一(API-RP-16Q [1], ISO 13624-1[2])。梁柱单元的使用对于立管整体响应的建模是令人满意的,然而,它可能导致与复杂几何形状、过度应力、应力集中和接触建模相关的局部响应结果的不确定性(DNV-ST-F201[3]、DNVGL-RP-F203[4]、ISO 13628-7[5])。本文的目的是比较整体有限元分析和局部有限元分析的上升管分析结果。通过这种比较,可以确定在部署/回收作业中,使用全局立管分析方法来确定立管结构限制的任何限制。还就使用全局分析方法提出了若干建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrity Monitoring of Offshore Arctic Pipelines Investigation of Near-Field Temperature Distribution in Buried Dense Phase CO2 Pipelines On the Plastic Bending Responses of Dented Lined Pipe Implementation of a Method for Free-Spanning Pipeline Analysis Simplified Stochastic Modelling of the Force on a Pipe Bend Due to Two-Phase Slug Flow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1