European Identity in Times of Crisis

Michal Šejvl
{"title":"European Identity in Times of Crisis","authors":"Michal Šejvl","doi":"10.33067/SE.1.2019.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay tries to discuss three possible models of common European identity based on shared political values, shared economic interests and shared cultural heritage in our actual situation when Europe is suffering from many crises or their aftermaths (Eurozone crisis, migration crisis or Brexit crisis). The fi rst non-exclusive “thin” identity model is based on many essentially contested concepts (in the essay demonstrated on the concept of human dignity) and its major weakness lies in the fact that many of these values are eroding in our practices, not only in the “new” EU member states. The approach based on shared pragmatic interests does not produce strong moral commitments, but the real problem of this model is that since the beginning of 1970s one of the truly European “innovations” – its post-war model of welfare state – is put into question (The essay tries to demonstrate it using the theory of Wolfgang Streeck). The common cultural heritage model that can produce “thick” identity is on the fi rst sight the most diffi cult to build because of the almost insurmountable plurality between European cultures. However, the shared culture can produce cosmopolitan “identity in diversity”, but only if material conditions for the creation of this “fragile” or “delicate” identity model are created in some form of reinvented welfare state that could liberate us from many fears we have.","PeriodicalId":128406,"journal":{"name":"Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs","volume":"12 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.1.2019.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This essay tries to discuss three possible models of common European identity based on shared political values, shared economic interests and shared cultural heritage in our actual situation when Europe is suffering from many crises or their aftermaths (Eurozone crisis, migration crisis or Brexit crisis). The fi rst non-exclusive “thin” identity model is based on many essentially contested concepts (in the essay demonstrated on the concept of human dignity) and its major weakness lies in the fact that many of these values are eroding in our practices, not only in the “new” EU member states. The approach based on shared pragmatic interests does not produce strong moral commitments, but the real problem of this model is that since the beginning of 1970s one of the truly European “innovations” – its post-war model of welfare state – is put into question (The essay tries to demonstrate it using the theory of Wolfgang Streeck). The common cultural heritage model that can produce “thick” identity is on the fi rst sight the most diffi cult to build because of the almost insurmountable plurality between European cultures. However, the shared culture can produce cosmopolitan “identity in diversity”, but only if material conditions for the creation of this “fragile” or “delicate” identity model are created in some form of reinvented welfare state that could liberate us from many fears we have.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机时期的欧洲认同
本文试图在欧洲正遭受许多危机或其后果(欧元区危机、移民危机或英国脱欧危机)的实际情况下,讨论基于共同政治价值观、共同经济利益和共同文化遗产的三种可能的欧洲共同认同模式。第一个非排他性的“薄”身份模型基于许多本质上有争议的概念(在关于人类尊严概念的文章中),其主要弱点在于,许多这些价值观在我们的实践中受到侵蚀,不仅在“新”欧盟成员国。基于共同实用主义利益的方法并没有产生强烈的道德承诺,但这种模式的真正问题在于,自20世纪70年代初以来,真正的欧洲“创新”之一——战后福利国家模式——受到了质疑(本文试图用沃尔夫冈·施特雷克的理论来证明这一点)。由于欧洲文化之间几乎不可逾越的多元性,能够产生“浓厚”认同的共同文化遗产模式乍一看是最难构建的。然而,共享文化可以产生世界主义的“多样性认同”,但前提是创造这种“脆弱的”或“精致的”认同模式的物质条件,以某种形式的改造福利国家,可以将我们从许多恐惧中解放出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National and European Identity – Opposing or Complementary Concepts in Czech, Polish and EU Law? Demographic Situation of the Czech Republic – The Current Situation and the Main Goals for the Future Enhanced Cooperation in the EU: Its Evolution and Position of the Czech Republic Constitutional Design, Rule of Law and Mutual Recognition in the Czech Republic Cohesion Policy in Poland and in the Czech Republic – Challenges and Prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1