Chelsea Dubiel, J. S. Cicek, Roxanne Greene, Shawn Bailey, F. Delijani
{"title":"AN ADAPTED ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS: GUIDING TOUCHSTONES","authors":"Chelsea Dubiel, J. S. Cicek, Roxanne Greene, Shawn Bailey, F. Delijani","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.14971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of engineering needs to develop while healing our relations with the lands, waters, and living systems. Fostering ethical spaces where Indigenous ways of knowing and being and western worldviews can hold space together, and cease to separate the technical from the social, are key to progressing equitably as a society. In the field of engineering within Turtle Island, it is essential that we adapt the engineering design process to reflect this. Following the execution of an Engineering and Architecture transdisciplinary Design Build course at University of Manitoba, and in partnership with the Shoal Lake No. 40 First Nation, it was acknowledged by stakeholders that further analysis of this project could establish lessons learned. This paper speaks to engineering education practice. The objective of this research is to develop recommendations for how the engineering design process can make space for Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Shoal Lake No. 40 community members, one engineering contractor, and four university faculty members were asked their perspectives on the development and implementation of two projects conducted with the community members and on the First Nation lands. Through the co-analysis of these open-ended discussions, recommendations were developed for how the engineering design process can integrate four touchstones external to the design process. The touchstones enable an engineer to perceive the design process and establish core intentions for a project that creates space for Indigenous values and principles and western worldviews.","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The field of engineering needs to develop while healing our relations with the lands, waters, and living systems. Fostering ethical spaces where Indigenous ways of knowing and being and western worldviews can hold space together, and cease to separate the technical from the social, are key to progressing equitably as a society. In the field of engineering within Turtle Island, it is essential that we adapt the engineering design process to reflect this. Following the execution of an Engineering and Architecture transdisciplinary Design Build course at University of Manitoba, and in partnership with the Shoal Lake No. 40 First Nation, it was acknowledged by stakeholders that further analysis of this project could establish lessons learned. This paper speaks to engineering education practice. The objective of this research is to develop recommendations for how the engineering design process can make space for Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Shoal Lake No. 40 community members, one engineering contractor, and four university faculty members were asked their perspectives on the development and implementation of two projects conducted with the community members and on the First Nation lands. Through the co-analysis of these open-ended discussions, recommendations were developed for how the engineering design process can integrate four touchstones external to the design process. The touchstones enable an engineer to perceive the design process and establish core intentions for a project that creates space for Indigenous values and principles and western worldviews.
工程领域需要发展,同时修复我们与土地、水和生命系统的关系。培育伦理空间,使土著的认识和存在方式与西方世界观能够将空间结合在一起,并停止将技术与社会分开,这是社会公平发展的关键。在海龟岛的工程领域,我们必须调整工程设计过程来反映这一点。在马尼托巴大学(University of Manitoba)与Shoal Lake No. 40 First Nation合作开展工程和建筑跨学科设计建造课程之后,利益相关者认识到,对该项目的进一步分析可以建立经验教训。本文从工程教育的实际出发。这项研究的目的是为工程设计过程如何为土著认识和存在的方式创造空间提出建议。Shoal Lake No. 40社区成员、一名工程承包商和四名大学教师被问及他们对与社区成员和第一民族土地进行的两个项目的开发和实施的看法。通过对这些开放式讨论的共同分析,提出了工程设计过程如何整合设计过程外部的四个试金石的建议。这些试金石使工程师能够感知设计过程,并为项目建立核心意图,为土著价值观和原则以及西方世界观创造空间。