Breakthrough Cancer Pain: The Current Pharmacological Management

Mochamat Mochamat, Taufik Eko Nugroho, S. Wicaksono
{"title":"Breakthrough Cancer Pain: The Current Pharmacological Management","authors":"Mochamat Mochamat, Taufik Eko Nugroho, S. Wicaksono","doi":"10.14710/jai.v0i0.44701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transient increase in pain that occurs on a background of stable pain. It contributes substantially to the suffering experienced by most cancer patients. The pharmacologic options for management of BTP have been expanded considerably in the past decade. Opioids remain the most effective pharmaceuticals used for the BTP case. In this systematic review we attempted to provide the currently available clinical data about pharmacological treatment for breakthrough cancer pain.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for Breakthrough painMethods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PubMed for the last ten years (from September 2010 to September 2020. Further potentially relevant studies were identified from reference lists of studies marked for inclusion and relevant reviews. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We screened the search results and included studies if they met the selection criteria.Result: We screened 205 publications of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. In total, we analysed data from 2129 participants. Overall, participant with BTP were treated with short acting opioid. Literature searching did not find any published evidence of non opioid drug to treat the BTP. Most adverse effects of the investigated drugs seemed to be moderate.Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that rapid onset opioids play significant role for BTP. Future studies may be conducted to explore the efficacy and safety profiles each regimen for patients with certain categories of cancer.","PeriodicalId":446295,"journal":{"name":"JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jai.v0i0.44701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transient increase in pain that occurs on a background of stable pain. It contributes substantially to the suffering experienced by most cancer patients. The pharmacologic options for management of BTP have been expanded considerably in the past decade. Opioids remain the most effective pharmaceuticals used for the BTP case. In this systematic review we attempted to provide the currently available clinical data about pharmacological treatment for breakthrough cancer pain.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for Breakthrough painMethods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PubMed for the last ten years (from September 2010 to September 2020. Further potentially relevant studies were identified from reference lists of studies marked for inclusion and relevant reviews. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We screened the search results and included studies if they met the selection criteria.Result: We screened 205 publications of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. In total, we analysed data from 2129 participants. Overall, participant with BTP were treated with short acting opioid. Literature searching did not find any published evidence of non opioid drug to treat the BTP. Most adverse effects of the investigated drugs seemed to be moderate.Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that rapid onset opioids play significant role for BTP. Future studies may be conducted to explore the efficacy and safety profiles each regimen for patients with certain categories of cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突破性癌症疼痛:当前的药理管理
背景:突破性疼痛(BTP)是一种短暂的疼痛增加,发生在稳定疼痛的背景下。它在很大程度上加剧了大多数癌症患者所经历的痛苦。在过去的十年中,治疗BTP的药理学选择已经大大扩展。阿片类药物仍然是治疗BTP病例最有效的药物。在这篇系统综述中,我们试图提供目前可用的关于突破性癌痛的药物治疗的临床数据。目的:评价突破性疼痛的药物治疗效果方法:检索Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)和PubMed近十年(2010年9月至2020年9月)的文献。从标记为纳入研究的参考文献列表和相关综述中确定进一步的潜在相关研究。两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们筛选了搜索结果,并纳入了符合选择标准的研究。结果:我们筛选出205篇文献,其中14篇符合纳入标准。我们总共分析了2129名参与者的数据。总体而言,BTP患者接受短效阿片类药物治疗。文献检索未发现任何发表的非阿片类药物治疗BTP的证据。所研究药物的大多数不良反应似乎是温和的。结论:快速起效阿片类药物对BTP有重要作用。未来的研究可能会探索每种治疗方案对某些类型癌症患者的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Double Whammy Cases of Severe Mitral Stenosis in Peripartum: A Survival Case Series Perbandingan Luaran Penggunaan Protokol Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) dengan Perawatan Perioperatif Konvensional pada Pembedahan Umum di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan Pemberian Kombinasi Krim Estetia dan Infiltrasi Lidokain 2% Untuk Mengurangi Nyeri Suntikan Jarum Anestesi Epidural Teknik Anestesia Epidural Dalam Operasi Herniotomi pada Pasien Atrial Septal Defect dengan Hipertensi Pulmonal Perbandingan Antara Ropivacaine-Dexmedetomidine versus Ropivacaine-Sufentanil untuk Analgesia Persalinan Normal: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Meta-Analisis Uji Acak Terkontrol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1