MOTIVASI ANGGOTA IPRAHUMAS INDONESIA DALAM PENULISAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

Aat Ruchiat Nugraha, Hanny Hafiar
{"title":"MOTIVASI ANGGOTA IPRAHUMAS INDONESIA DALAM PENULISAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH","authors":"Aat Ruchiat Nugraha, Hanny Hafiar","doi":"10.24198/jmk.v7i1.40059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional development must be carried out to increase the value of quality and the professional welfare of functional workers in government institutions. Professional development efforts can be made by writing published scientific papers (KTI). The existence of scientific work becomes essential and is a prerequisite for those who want to improve the hierarchy of ranks and positions in government institutions. Scientific works published in scientific journals on behalf of individuals and groups that discuss social and public relations phenomena can be used as the performance standards barometer for government public relations functional employees to get income incentives. This study aims to identify and explain the instructional communication strategies and motivations of the Iprahumas Training participants in writing scientific papers. The research method used is the form of a survey in the form of a census of all participants of the training in writing scientific papers, namely the public relations institutions who are members of the Indonesian Public Relations Official Association (Iprahumas). The data collection technique was carried out by giving questionnaires to the participants, which were equipped with observation guidelines, interviews, and literature studies. Research shows that the motivation of Iprahumas scientific papers writing training participants is still low, namely 71.4% are unable to write scientific papers. That is because participants have limited knowledge and experience writing scientific papers in scientific journals. The participants tried to be able to implement communication strategies in the form of continuous technical guidance regularly with mentors through the WhatsApp social media group. The study's conclusion showed that the participants' understanding of scientific writing through scientific writing training was still low, which had implications for the participants' motivation to decrease. Only a few participants prepared the type of scientific article writing during the scientific writing workshop.","PeriodicalId":251017,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jmk.v7i1.40059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional development must be carried out to increase the value of quality and the professional welfare of functional workers in government institutions. Professional development efforts can be made by writing published scientific papers (KTI). The existence of scientific work becomes essential and is a prerequisite for those who want to improve the hierarchy of ranks and positions in government institutions. Scientific works published in scientific journals on behalf of individuals and groups that discuss social and public relations phenomena can be used as the performance standards barometer for government public relations functional employees to get income incentives. This study aims to identify and explain the instructional communication strategies and motivations of the Iprahumas Training participants in writing scientific papers. The research method used is the form of a survey in the form of a census of all participants of the training in writing scientific papers, namely the public relations institutions who are members of the Indonesian Public Relations Official Association (Iprahumas). The data collection technique was carried out by giving questionnaires to the participants, which were equipped with observation guidelines, interviews, and literature studies. Research shows that the motivation of Iprahumas scientific papers writing training participants is still low, namely 71.4% are unable to write scientific papers. That is because participants have limited knowledge and experience writing scientific papers in scientific journals. The participants tried to be able to implement communication strategies in the form of continuous technical guidance regularly with mentors through the WhatsApp social media group. The study's conclusion showed that the participants' understanding of scientific writing through scientific writing training was still low, which had implications for the participants' motivation to decrease. Only a few participants prepared the type of scientific article writing during the scientific writing workshop.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼公关人员在撰写科学论文方面的动机
必须实施专业发展,提高政府事业单位职能人员的素质价值和职业福利。专业发展的努力可以通过撰写发表的科学论文(KTI)来实现。科学工作的存在变得至关重要,对于那些想要提高政府机构的等级和职位等级的人来说,这是一个先决条件。代表个人和团体发表在科学期刊上的讨论社会公共关系现象的科学著作,可以作为政府公关职能人员获得收入激励的绩效标准晴雨表。本研究旨在找出并解释Iprahumas培训学员在撰写科学论文时的教学沟通策略与动机。所使用的研究方法是对参加科学论文写作培训的所有参与者,即印度尼西亚公共关系官方协会(Iprahumas)成员的公共关系机构进行普查形式的调查。数据收集技术采用问卷调查的方式进行,问卷调查采用观察指导、访谈、文献研究等方法。研究表明,Iprahumas科学论文写作培训参与者的动机仍然很低,即71.4%的人不会写科学论文。这是因为参与者在科学期刊上撰写科学论文的知识和经验有限。参与者试图通过WhatsApp社交媒体群与导师定期进行持续的技术指导,以实现沟通策略。研究的结论表明,参与者通过科学写作训练对科学写作的理解仍然很低,这对参与者的动机降低有影响。在科学写作研讨会上,只有少数参与者准备了科学文章写作的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social media usage as health communication platform by adolescents with acne in Indonesia Athlete branding Edgar Xavier Marvelo as an Indonesian wushu athlete on Instagram The maximization of Bamed Health Care social media marketing in the pandemic era Golkar party’s utilization of TikTok for the 2024 election campaign Building public satisfaction with marketing communication strategy and service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1