Efektifitas Pembentukan Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tingkat ASEAN Oleh Asean Intern-Governmental Commision On Human Rights (AICHR)

Yogi Syahputra Al idrus, Ilham Rusadi Abdullah, Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
{"title":"Efektifitas Pembentukan Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tingkat ASEAN Oleh Asean Intern-Governmental Commision On Human Rights (AICHR)","authors":"Yogi Syahputra Al idrus, Ilham Rusadi Abdullah, Tinuk Dwi Cahyani","doi":"10.59141/comserva.v2i11.689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Rights (HAM) is a value that is very essential since humans are born into the world which in everyday life has a natural nature attached to every individual whenever and wherever so that concretization through law becomes a repressive and preventive effort to pay attention, respect, appreciate and uphold it. Efforts to uphold human rights have been since 2009 the AICHR Court was formed through the 15th Summit as a human rights commission at the ASEAN level, until now the effectiveness of the performance of AICHR is still far from perfect because there have been cases that occurred in several ASEAN countries such as the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Cambodia. This was not responded to at all by the AICHR court itself because the main function of AICHR is to protect and promote it in the form of protection at the ASEAN level so that it cannot assimilate and resolve cases that occur. Therefore the author sets out concretely two perspectives on how far the effectiveness and consequences of establishing the AICHR human rights court at the ASEAN level are. First, what are the causes of AICHR's ineffectiveness in upholding human rights in Southeast Asia? These two problems can be examined doctrinally and normatively conceptually to produce the following findings: firstly the lack of commitment from each ASEAN country to human rights, secondly the principle of non-intervention from each country so that decision making is based on consensus.","PeriodicalId":256888,"journal":{"name":"COMSERVA Indonesian Jurnal of Community Services and Development","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMSERVA Indonesian Jurnal of Community Services and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i11.689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human Rights (HAM) is a value that is very essential since humans are born into the world which in everyday life has a natural nature attached to every individual whenever and wherever so that concretization through law becomes a repressive and preventive effort to pay attention, respect, appreciate and uphold it. Efforts to uphold human rights have been since 2009 the AICHR Court was formed through the 15th Summit as a human rights commission at the ASEAN level, until now the effectiveness of the performance of AICHR is still far from perfect because there have been cases that occurred in several ASEAN countries such as the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Cambodia. This was not responded to at all by the AICHR court itself because the main function of AICHR is to protect and promote it in the form of protection at the ASEAN level so that it cannot assimilate and resolve cases that occur. Therefore the author sets out concretely two perspectives on how far the effectiveness and consequences of establishing the AICHR human rights court at the ASEAN level are. First, what are the causes of AICHR's ineffectiveness in upholding human rights in Southeast Asia? These two problems can be examined doctrinally and normatively conceptually to produce the following findings: firstly the lack of commitment from each ASEAN country to human rights, secondly the principle of non-intervention from each country so that decision making is based on consensus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权委员会(人权委员会)成立东盟人权法院(人权委员会)的有效性
人权是一项非常重要的价值,因为人类出生在这个世界上,在日常生活中,无论何时何地,每个人都有一种自然的性质,因此通过法律具体化成为一种压制性和预防性的努力,以注意、尊重、欣赏和维护人权。自2009年AICHR法院通过第15届峰会作为东盟层面的人权委员会成立以来,一直在努力维护人权,直到现在,由于在菲律宾,印度尼西亚,马来西亚和柬埔寨等几个东盟国家发生了案件,AICHR的执行效果仍然远远不够完美。这根本没有得到AICHR法院本身的回应,因为AICHR的主要功能是以东盟层面的保护形式保护和促进它,这样它就不能吸收和解决发生的案件。因此,作者就在东盟一级建立《亚洲人权公约》人权法院的有效性和后果具体提出了两种观点。第一,《亚洲国际人权公约》在维护东南亚人权方面效果不佳的原因是什么?这两个问题可以从理论上和规范的概念上加以审查,得出以下结论:首先,每个东盟国家都缺乏对人权的承诺,其次,每个国家都不干涉原则,以便决策建立在协商一致的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sistem Informasi Pendataan Engine Alat Berat Komatsu Berbasis Web Analisis Normatif Sanksi Bagi Para Pelaku Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Berdasarkan Prespektif Hukum Lingkungan Analisis Media Sosial Tiktok Terhadap Perubahan Tingkah Laku Siswa di SMPN 11 Maros Baru Analisis Dana Alokasi Umum dan Khusus Terhadap Belanja Daerah pada Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Kebumen Implementasi Moderisasi Beragama Dipondok Pesantren dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Islam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1