A New Integration Era in the EU: Theory, Assessment and Main Challenges

Constantinos Ikonomou
{"title":"A New Integration Era in the EU: Theory, Assessment and Main Challenges","authors":"Constantinos Ikonomou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3675008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is hard to re-create the edifice of a united Europe. It was based on substantial theoretical developments from integration theory, economics, international, political, cultural, social and other studies, layered at the top of economic, social, cultural and other existing foundations of nation-states. Their contribution in the unification is often disregarded, and has been overshadowed by problems encountered after the two most recent crises, the “Brexit”, the missing Eurozone components revealed and the realization that the European integration remains incomplete. After highlighting the most principal theoretical foundations and the recent, significant institutional and policy amendments at the common edifice, a long-term assessment of the EU integration process is attempted for the 1971–2015 period, by comparing GDP per head (in constant PPPs) and its change, for EU and non-EU states that are OECD members. Several points are raised on the unification and the mistakes made that risk harming it even further. It is suggested that a new, hitherto unidentified, integration stage has been formed that will require further use of economic theory and the setting-up of a common production union to advance competitiveness and co-operation, while espousing common European values and culture.","PeriodicalId":296326,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is hard to re-create the edifice of a united Europe. It was based on substantial theoretical developments from integration theory, economics, international, political, cultural, social and other studies, layered at the top of economic, social, cultural and other existing foundations of nation-states. Their contribution in the unification is often disregarded, and has been overshadowed by problems encountered after the two most recent crises, the “Brexit”, the missing Eurozone components revealed and the realization that the European integration remains incomplete. After highlighting the most principal theoretical foundations and the recent, significant institutional and policy amendments at the common edifice, a long-term assessment of the EU integration process is attempted for the 1971–2015 period, by comparing GDP per head (in constant PPPs) and its change, for EU and non-EU states that are OECD members. Several points are raised on the unification and the mistakes made that risk harming it even further. It is suggested that a new, hitherto unidentified, integration stage has been formed that will require further use of economic theory and the setting-up of a common production union to advance competitiveness and co-operation, while espousing common European values and culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟一体化新时代:理论、评估与主要挑战
重建一个统一的欧洲大厦是困难的。它基于整合理论、经济学、国际、政治、文化、社会和其他研究的大量理论发展,在民族国家的经济、社会、文化和其他现有基础之上分层。他们对统一的贡献往往被忽视,并且被最近两次危机后遇到的问题所掩盖,“英国脱欧”,欧元区缺失部分的暴露以及欧洲一体化仍未完成的认识。在强调了最主要的理论基础和共同大楼最近的重大制度和政策修订之后,通过比较经合组织成员国的欧盟和非欧盟国家的人均GDP(以恒定购买力平价计算)及其变化,试图对1971-2015年期间的欧盟一体化进程进行长期评估。关于统一和所犯的错误提出了几点,这些错误可能会进一步损害统一。有人提出,一个迄今尚未确定的新的一体化阶段已经形成,这将需要进一步运用经济理论,建立一个共同的生产联盟,以提高竞争力和合作,同时支持欧洲共同的价值观和文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mind the (trade) gap! How costly is erecting barriers to trade? LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA AD EXTRA (The European Union and Ad Extra Food Security) How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Responding to Hybridity in an Unstable Neighborhood: The Efficiency of the EU State-centric Approach to the Crisis in Libya and Ukraine Report on the Dynamics of Differentiated Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1